netdev - [PATCH] net: dsa: ocelot: use div64_u64() instead of do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1644395942-4186-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
Date:   Wed,  9 Feb 2022 00:39:02 -0800
From:   Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
        Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: dsa: ocelot: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()

From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>

do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.

fix do_div.cocci warning:
do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.

Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
---
 drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
index bf8d382..5c2482f
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/ocelot/felix_vsc9959.c
@@ -1178,7 +1178,7 @@ static void vsc9959_new_base_time(struct ocelot *ocelot, ktime_t base_time,
 	if (base_time < current_time) {
 		u64 nr_of_cycles = current_time - base_time;
 
-		do_div(nr_of_cycles, cycle_time);
+		div64_u64(nr_of_cycles, cycle_time);
 		new_base_time += cycle_time * (nr_of_cycles + 1);
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4