[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20fc8ef9-6cbc-ac1d-97ad-ab47a2874afd@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:41:50 +0800
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Tony Lu <tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: kgraul@...ux.ibm.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 5/5] net/smc: Add global configure for auto
fallback by netlink
I don't think this is necessary, since we already have socket options.
Is there any scenario that the socket options and global switch can not
cover?
Thanks.
在 2022/2/9 下午5:33, Tony Lu 写道:
> SMC supports net namespace, it would be better to provide a per
> net-namespace switch. Generally, one container has one application, runs
> different workload that is different from others. So the behavior could
> be different, such as high-performance (don't fallback for limit) or TCP
> transparent replacement (limit if needed).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists