netdev - Re: [PATCH net v3] tcp: Don't acquire inet_listen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 8 Feb 2022 17:03:14 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.co.jp>,
        eric.dumazet@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org,
        efault@....de, tglx@...utronix.de, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v3] tcp: Don't acquire inet_listen_hashbucket::lock
 with disabled BH.

On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 18:01:41 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>    Reposted with fixes and net-tree as requested. Please keep in mind that
>    this only effects the PREEMPT_RT preemption model and I'm posting this
>    as part of the merging efforts. Therefore I didn't add the Fixes: tag
>    and used net-next as I didn't expect any -stable backports (but then
>    Greg sometimes backports RT-only patches since "it makes the life of
>    some folks easier" as he puts it).

It says [PATCH net] in the the subject :S  net-next makes sense.