[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <699b8636cafcfa82a99cf290e3cffbab91b6afbb.camel@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:20:53 +0000
From: "Nguyen, Anthony L" <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>
To: "kurt@...utronix.de" <kurt@...utronix.de>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "Karlsson, Magnus" <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"vinschen@...hat.com" <vinschen@...hat.com>,
"john.fastabend@...il.com" <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
"hawk@...nel.org" <hawk@...nel.org>,
"ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2][pull request] 1GbE Intel Wired LAN Driver
Updates 2022-02-07
On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 09:13 +0100, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote:
> Hi Tony,
>
> On Tue Feb 08 2022, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 15:32:44 -0800 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> > > Corinna Vinschen says:
> > >
> > > Fix the kernel warning "Missing unregister, handled but fix
> > > driver"
> > > when running, e.g.,
> > >
> > > $ ethtool -G eth0 rx 1024
> > >
> > > on igc. Remove memset hack from igb and align igb code to igc.
> >
> > Why -next?
As the original submission was targeting -next, I carried that forward.
Since the warning said it was handled, I thought it was ok to go there.
> Can we get these patches into net, please? The mentioned igc problem
> exists on v5.15-LTS too.
I'll follow the igc patch and submit a request to stable when it hits
Linus' tree. For igb, as it sounds like things are working, just not
with the preferred method, so I don't plan on sending that to stable.
Or is there an issue there that this patch needs to go to stable as
well?
Thanks,
Tony
> FWIW, Tested-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>
>
> Thanks,
> Kurt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists