[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJq09z49EEMxtBTs9q0sg3nn0VrSi0M=DkQTJ_n=QmgTr1aonw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:43:15 -0300
From:   Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "open list:NETWORKING DRIVERS" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dsa: realtek-smi: convert to YAML schema
> > However, the linux driver today does not care about any of these
> > interruptions but INT_TYPE_LINK_STATUS. So it simply multiplex only
> > this the interruption to each port, in a n-cell map (n being number of
> > ports).
> > I don't know what to describe here as device-tree should be something
> > independent of a particular OS or driver.
>
> You shouldn't need to know what Linux does to figure this out.
The Linux driver is masquerading all those interruptions into a single
"link status changed". If interrupts property is about what the HW
sends to us, it is a single pin.
  interrupt-controller:
   type: object
   description: |
     This defines an interrupt controller with an IRQ line (typically
     a GPIO) that will demultiplex and handle the interrupt from the single
     interrupt line coming out of one of the Realtek switch chips. It most
     importantly provides link up/down interrupts to the PHY blocks inside
     the ASIC.
   properties:
     interrupt-controller: true
     interrupts:
       maxItems: 1
       description:
         A single IRQ line from the switch, either active LOW or HIGH
     '#address-cells':
       const: 0
     '#interrupt-cells':
       const: 1
   required:
     - interrupt-controller
     - '#address-cells'
     - '#interrupt-cells'
Now as it is also an interrupt-controller, shouldn't I document what it emits?
I've just sent the new version and we can discuss it there.
> >  - one interrupt for the switch
> >  - the switch is an interrupt-controller
> >  - ... and is the interrupt-parent for the phy nodes.
>
> This pattern is pretty common for DSA switches, which have internal
> PHYs. You can see this in the mv88e6xxx binding for example.
The issue is that those similar devices are still not in yaml format.
>       Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists