netdev - [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <75b1108013d44bdaab905db9ab75ad2a16619b57.1644481811.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:11:34 +0800
From:   "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     kgraul@...ux.ibm.com
Cc:     kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next v7 1/5] net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent

From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>

In multithread and 10K connections benchmark, the backend TCP connection
established very slowly, and lots of TCP connections stay in SYN_SENT
state.

Client: smc_run wrk -c 10000 -t 4 http://server

the netstate of server host shows like:
    145042 times the listen queue of a socket overflowed
    145042 SYNs to LISTEN sockets dropped

One reason of this issue is that, since the smc_tcp_listen_work() shared
the same workqueue (smc_hs_wq) with smc_listen_work(), while the
smc_listen_work() do blocking wait for smc connection established. Once
the workqueue became congested, it's will block the accept() from TCP
listen.

This patch creates a independent workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq) for
smc_tcp_listen_work(), separate it from smc_listen_work(), which is
quite acceptable considering that smc_tcp_listen_work() runs very fast.

Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/af_smc.c | 13 +++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c
index 00b2e9d..4969ac8 100644
--- a/net/smc/af_smc.c
+++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
 						 * creation on client
 						 */
 
+static struct workqueue_struct	*smc_tcp_ls_wq;	/* wq for tcp listen work */
 struct workqueue_struct	*smc_hs_wq;	/* wq for handshake work */
 struct workqueue_struct	*smc_close_wq;	/* wq for close work */
 
@@ -2227,7 +2228,7 @@ static void smc_clcsock_data_ready(struct sock *listen_clcsock)
 	lsmc->clcsk_data_ready(listen_clcsock);
 	if (lsmc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) {
 		sock_hold(&lsmc->sk); /* sock_put in smc_tcp_listen_work() */
-		if (!queue_work(smc_hs_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work))
+		if (!queue_work(smc_tcp_ls_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work))
 			sock_put(&lsmc->sk);
 	}
 }
@@ -3024,9 +3025,14 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
 		goto out_nl;
 
 	rc = -ENOMEM;
+
+	smc_tcp_ls_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_tcp_ls_wq", 0, 0);
+	if (!smc_tcp_ls_wq)
+		goto out_pnet;
+
 	smc_hs_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_hs_wq", 0, 0);
 	if (!smc_hs_wq)
-		goto out_pnet;
+		goto out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq;
 
 	smc_close_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_close_wq", 0, 0);
 	if (!smc_close_wq)
@@ -3097,6 +3103,8 @@ static int __init smc_init(void)
 	destroy_workqueue(smc_close_wq);
 out_alloc_hs_wq:
 	destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq);
+out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq:
+	destroy_workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq);
 out_pnet:
 	smc_pnet_exit();
 out_nl:
@@ -3115,6 +3123,7 @@ static void __exit smc_exit(void)
 	smc_core_exit();
 	smc_ib_unregister_client();
 	destroy_workqueue(smc_close_wq);
+	destroy_workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq);
 	destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq);
 	proto_unregister(&smc_proto6);
 	proto_unregister(&smc_proto);
-- 
1.8.3.1