[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220210125201.2859463-9-vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:51:57 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>,
DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 08/12] net: dsa: remove "ds" and "port" from struct dsa_switchdev_event_work
By construction, the struct net_device *dev passed to
dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work() via struct dsa_switchdev_event_work
is always a DSA slave device (so far; there are plans to accept LAG
interfaces too).
Therefore, it is redundant to pass struct dsa_switch and int port
information in the deferred work structure. This can be retrieved at all
times from the provided struct net_device via dsa_slave_to_port().
For the same reason, we can drop the dsa_is_user_port() check in
dsa_fdb_offload_notify(). Even if it wasn't a DSA user port but a LAG
interface, nothing would need to change and we would still notify the
FDB offload in the same way.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
net/dsa/dsa_priv.h | 2 --
net/dsa/slave.c | 16 +++++-----------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
index 0853eed44fc9..885cc8df0c4e 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa_priv.h
@@ -117,8 +117,6 @@ struct dsa_notifier_master_state_info {
};
struct dsa_switchdev_event_work {
- struct dsa_switch *ds;
- int port;
struct net_device *dev;
struct work_struct work;
unsigned long event;
diff --git a/net/dsa/slave.c b/net/dsa/slave.c
index 974dc9f025e1..34bb20647bed 100644
--- a/net/dsa/slave.c
+++ b/net/dsa/slave.c
@@ -2411,29 +2411,25 @@ static void
dsa_fdb_offload_notify(struct dsa_switchdev_event_work *switchdev_work)
{
struct switchdev_notifier_fdb_info info = {};
- struct dsa_switch *ds = switchdev_work->ds;
- struct dsa_port *dp;
-
- if (!dsa_is_user_port(ds, switchdev_work->port))
- return;
info.addr = switchdev_work->addr;
info.vid = switchdev_work->vid;
info.offloaded = true;
- dp = dsa_to_port(ds, switchdev_work->port);
call_switchdev_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED,
- dp->slave, &info.info, NULL);
+ switchdev_work->dev, &info.info, NULL);
}
static void dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct dsa_switchdev_event_work *switchdev_work =
container_of(work, struct dsa_switchdev_event_work, work);
- struct dsa_switch *ds = switchdev_work->ds;
+ struct net_device *dev = switchdev_work->dev;
+ struct dsa_switch *ds;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int err;
- dp = dsa_to_port(ds, switchdev_work->port);
+ dp = dsa_slave_to_port(dev);
+ ds = dp->ds;
switch (switchdev_work->event) {
case SWITCHDEV_FDB_ADD_TO_DEVICE:
@@ -2532,8 +2528,6 @@ static int dsa_slave_fdb_event(struct net_device *dev,
host_addr ? " as host address" : "");
INIT_WORK(&switchdev_work->work, dsa_slave_switchdev_event_work);
- switchdev_work->ds = ds;
- switchdev_work->port = dp->index;
switchdev_work->event = event;
switchdev_work->dev = dev;
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists