[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4f1f9b1-6e8e-d21d-603f-7a0889e33a78@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:55:40 +0200
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] net: bridge: add knob for filtering rx/tx BPDU packets
on a port
On 10/02/2022 16:24, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> Some devices (e.g. wireless APs) can't have devices behind them be part of
> a bridge topology with redundant links, due to address limitations.
> Additionally, broadcast traffic on these devices is somewhat expensive, due to
> the low data rate and wakeups of clients in powersave mode.
> This knob can be used to ensure that BPDU packets are never sent or forwarded
> to/from these devices
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
> ---
> include/linux/if_bridge.h | 1 +
> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> net/bridge/br_forward.c | 5 +++++
> net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 ++
> net/bridge/br_netlink.c | 6 +++++-
> net/bridge/br_stp_bpdu.c | 9 +++++++--
> net/core/rtnetlink.c | 4 +++-
> 7 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
Why can't netfilter or tc be used to filter these frames?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists