[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5a13e486f5eb8c15ae536bde714be873aa22aeb9.camel@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 15:38:59 +0000
From: <Prasanna.VengateshanVaradharajan@...rochip.com>
To: <enguerrand.de-ribaucourt@...oirfairelinux.com>, <andrew@...n.ch>
CC: <linux@...linux.org.uk>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>, <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: micrel: add Microchip KSZ 9897 Switch
PHY support
On Thu, 2022-02-10 at 21:00 +0530, Prasanna Vengateshan wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-02-08 at 14:13 +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> > content is safe
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:38:41AM -0500, Enguerrand de Ribaucourt wrote:
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: "Andrew Lunn" <andrew@...n.ch>
> > > > To: "Enguerrand de Ribaucourt" <
> > > > enguerrand.de-ribaucourt@...oirfairelinux.com>
> > > > Cc: "netdev" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "hkallweit1"
> > > > <hkallweit1@...il.com>, "linux" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 8, 2022 12:28:53 AM
> > > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: micrel: add Microchip KSZ 9897
> > > > Switch PHY support
> > >
> > > > > + /* KSZ8081A3/KSZ8091R1 PHY and KSZ9897 switch share the same
> > > > > + * exact PHY ID. However, they can be told apart by the default value
> > > > > + * of the LED mode. It is 0 for the PHY, and 1 for the switch.
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + ret &= (MICREL_KSZ8081_CTRL2_LED_MODE0 |
> > > > > MICREL_KSZ8081_CTRL2_LED_MODE1);
> > > > > + if (!ksz_8081)
> > > > > + return ret;
> > > > > + else
> > > > > + return !ret;
> > >
> > > > What exactly does MICREL_KSZ8081_CTRL2_LED_MODE0 and
> > > > MICREL_KSZ8081_CTRL2_LED_MODE1 mean? We have to be careful in that
> > > > there could be use cases which actually wants to configure the
> > > > LEDs. There have been recent discussions for two other PHYs recently
> > > > where the bootloader is configuring the LEDs, to something other than
> > > > their default value.
> > >
> > > Those registers configure the LED Mode according to the KSZ8081 datasheet:
> > > [00] = LED1: Speed LED0: Link/Activity
> > > [01] = LED1: Activity LED0: Link
> > > [10], [11] = Reserved
> > > default value is [00].
> > >
> > > Indeed, if the bootloader changes them, we would match the wrong
> > > device. However, I closely examined all the registers, and there is no
> > > read-only bit that we can use to differentiate both models. The
> > > LED mode bits are the only ones that have a different default value on the
> > > KSZ8081: [00] and the KSZ9897: [01]. Also, the RMII registers are not
> > > documented in the KSZ9897 datasheet so that value is not guaranteed to
> > > be [01] even though that's what I observed.
> > >
> > > Do you think we should find another way to match KSZ8081 and KSZ9897?
> > > The good news is that I'm now confident about the phy_id emitted by
> > > both models.
> >
> > Lets try asking Prasanna Vengateshan, who is working on other
> > Microchip switches and PHYs at Microchip.
> >
> > Andrew
>
> I have already forwarded to the team who worked on the KSZ9897 PHY and added
> here (part of UNGLinuxDriver).
>
> Prasanna V
Added right email id..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists