netdev - Re: [v6] dsa: mv88e6xxx: make serdes SGMII/Fiber tx amplitude configurable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220210173632.13e31df3@dellmb>
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 17:36:32 +0100
From:   Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
To:     Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com>
Cc:     "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Subject: Re: [v6] dsa: mv88e6xxx: make serdes SGMII/Fiber tx amplitude
 configurable

On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 16:26:17 +0000
Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com> wrote:

> > > The mv88e6352, mv88e6240 and mv88e6176  have a serdes interface. This
> > > patch allows to configure the output swing to a desired value in the
> > > phy-handle of the port. The value which is peak to peak has to be
> > > specified in microvolts. As the chips only supports eight dedicated
> > > values we return EINVAL if the value in the DTS does not match one of
> > > these values.
> > >
> > > CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> > > CC: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> > > CC: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Holger Brunck <holger.brunck@...achienergy.com>  
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Marek Behún <kabel@...nel.org>
> > 
> > Keep in mind that the tx-p2p-amplitude DT property is not merged in DT yet. I
> > suggest you resend this patch as a series of 2 patches, the first being the DT
> > patch:
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20220119131117.30245-1-
> > kabel@...nel.org/
> > where you should also add Rob's reviewed-by tag, which he sent in
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-
> > devicetree/YgGBe0BS%2Fd0lOVtU@...h.at.kernel.org/
> >   
> 
> I can do that. But then it has to go through the netdev-next tree or? As I have
> now dependencies to Russels changes which are sitting in netdev-next.

Yes, your patches should have tag net-next.

Marek