lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:19:52 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
CC:     Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 1/3] bpf: Add "live packet" mode for XDP in
 bpf_prog_run()

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 05:37:54PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 9, 2022 at 4:30 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > I left that out on purpose: I feel it's exposing an internal
> > implementation detail as UAPI (as you said). And I'm not convinced it
> > really needed (or helpful) - see below.
> 
> It's irrelevant whether it's documented or not.
> Once this implementation detail is being relied upon
> by user space it becomes an undocumented uapi that we cannot change.
> 
> > I'll try implementing a TCP stream mode in xdp_trafficgen just to make
> > sure I'm not missing something. But I believe that sending out a stream
> > of packets that looks like a coherent TCP stream should be simple
> > enough, at least. Dealing with the full handshake + CWND control loop
> > will be harder, though, and right now I think it'll require multiple
> > trips back to userspace.
> 
> The patch set looks very close to being able to do such TCP streaming.
> Let's make sure nothing is missing from API before we land it.
Hi Toke,  I am also looking at ways to blast tcp packets by using
bpf to overcome the pktgen udp-only limitation.
Are you planning to respin with a TCP stream mode in xdp_trafficgen ?
Thanks !

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ