lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgYoT4UWw0Efq33K@nataraja>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:11:43 +0100
From:   Harald Welte <laforge@...ocom.org>
To:     Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com,
        wojciech.drewek@...el.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        pablo@...filter.org, osmocom-net-gprs@...ts.osmocom.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v3 1/5] gtp: Allow to create GTP device
 without FDs

Hi Marcin,

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:04:01PM +0100, Marcin Szycik wrote:
> On 05-Feb-22 17:34, Harald Welte wrote:
> > Hi Marcin, Wojciech,
> > 
> > thanks for the revised patch. In general it looks fine to me.
> > 
> > Do you have a public git tree with your patchset applied?  I'm asking as
> > we do have automatic testing in place at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/ where I
> > just need to specify a remote git repo andit will build this kernel and
> > run the test suite.
> 
> I've created a public fork with our patchset applied, please see [1].

Thanks, I've triggered a build, let's hope it works out.  Results should
be at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/
and detailed logs at https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-git/20/console

The same testsuite executed  against master can be seen at
https://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/job/ttcn3-ggsn-test-kernel-latest-torvalds/
[the high amount of test cases failing is due to the lack of IPv6 support in the kernel GTP].

Let's hope your forked repo renders identical test results to upstream!

Regards,
	Harald
-- 
- Harald Welte <laforge@...ocom.org>            http://laforge.gnumonks.org/
============================================================================
"Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option."
                                                  (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ