[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87iltjuevn.fsf@bang-olufsen.dk>
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2022 12:31:40 +0000
From: Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
CC: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"vivien.didelot@...il.com" <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
"olteanv@...il.com" <olteanv@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net: dsa: realtek: realtek-mdio: reset before
setup
Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com> writes:
>
>>
>> On 12 Feb 2022, at 05:27, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com> wrote:
>>
>> Some devices, like the switch in Banana Pi BPI R64 only starts to answer
>> after a HW reset. It is the same reset code from realtek-smi.
>>
>> In realtek-smi, only assert the reset when the gpio is defined.
>
> If realtek-smi also resets before setup with this patch (I don’t understand code very well) can you mention it next to mdio in the summary too?
realtek-smi was already asserting reset. I just asked Luiz to send a
patch to only try the reset if reset-gpio is actually specified, else it
prints "asserting RESET" without actually doing it. So this is largely
cosmetic. But it is odd to touch realtek-smi when the subject is
realtek-mdio.
Arguably this could be separated into a few patches; something to
consider if you decide to send a v3 per Florian's comment:
1. realtek-smi: add if block around reset-gpio assertion
2. realtek-smi: demote dev_info to dev_dbg in reset-gpio assertion
3. realtek-mdio: add HW reset here too, based on realtek-smi (with
dev_dbg)
Kind regards,
Alvin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists