netdev - Re: [RFC] CDC-NCM: avoid overflow in sanity checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:41:24 +0100
From:   Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To:     Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>
Cc:     Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        Hans Petter Selasky <hps@...asky.org>,
        linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] CDC-NCM: avoid overflow in sanity checking

Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com> writes:

> Do we still agree that unsigned integers are the better option?

Yes.  What Alan said made perfect sense.  As always.


Bjørn