lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220214155205.22135ebb@hermes.local>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:52:05 -0800
From:   Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: vlan: check for errors from
 __vlan_del in __vlan_flush

On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 01:36:46 +0200
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> wrote:

> +		if (err) {
> +			br_err(br,
> +			       "port %u(%s) failed to delete vlan %d: %pe\n",
> +			       (unsigned int) p->port_no, p->dev->name,
> +			       vlan->vid, ERR_PTR(err));

Don't understand this last argument here.
It takes an integer error number, then converts it to an error pointer
just so the error message can then decode with %pe? Why?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ