lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000000000007646bd05d7f81943@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 14 Feb 2022 02:44:22 -0800
From:   syzbot <syzbot+87f65c75f4a72db05445@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, hpa@...or.com,
        jgross@...e.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        mingo@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tglx@...utronix.de, x86@...nel.org
Subject: [syzbot] kernel BUG in __text_poke

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    f95f768f0af4 bpf, x86_64: Fail gracefully on bpf_jit_binar..
git tree:       bpf-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=13fb08c2700000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c40b67275bfe2a58
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=87f65c75f4a72db05445
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+87f65c75f4a72db05445@...kaller.appspotmail.com

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:989!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
CPU: 0 PID: 12993 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.16.0-syzkaller-11632-gf95f768f0af4 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:__text_poke+0x343/0x8c0 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:989
Code: c3 0f 86 2c fe ff ff 49 8d bc 24 00 10 00 00 e8 43 be 88 00 48 89 44 24 28 48 85 db 74 0c 48 83 7c 24 28 00 0f 85 1b fe ff ff <0f> 0b 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff ff 0f 00 49 21 c0 48 85 db 0f 85 c6 02
RSP: 0018:ffffc90005e6f7a8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88807d1c8000 RSI: ffffffff81b3c443 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000080 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc90005e6f7bf
R10: ffffffff81b3c3e1 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffa0010e00
R13: 0000000000000080 R14: 0000000000000e80 R15: 0000000000002000
FS:  00007fd60b1d8700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9c00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f9329383090 CR3: 000000007c3bb000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000600
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 text_poke_copy+0x66/0xa0 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:1132
 bpf_arch_text_copy+0x21/0x40 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2426
 bpf_jit_binary_pack_finalize+0x43/0x170 kernel/bpf/core.c:1094
 bpf_int_jit_compile+0x9d5/0x12f0 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:2383
 bpf_prog_select_runtime+0x4d4/0x8a0 kernel/bpf/core.c:2159
 bpf_prog_load+0xfe6/0x2250 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2349
 __sys_bpf+0x68a/0x59a0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4640
 __do_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4744 [inline]
 __se_sys_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4742 [inline]
 __x64_sys_bpf+0x75/0xb0 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4742
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
RIP: 0033:0x7fd60c863059
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fd60b1d8168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000141
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fd60c975f60 RCX: 00007fd60c863059
RDX: 0000000000000048 RSI: 0000000020000200 RDI: 0000000000000005
RBP: 00007fd60c8bd08d R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffec77d82ef R14: 00007fd60b1d8300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
RIP: 0010:__text_poke+0x343/0x8c0 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:989
Code: c3 0f 86 2c fe ff ff 49 8d bc 24 00 10 00 00 e8 43 be 88 00 48 89 44 24 28 48 85 db 74 0c 48 83 7c 24 28 00 0f 85 1b fe ff ff <0f> 0b 48 b8 00 f0 ff ff ff ff 0f 00 49 21 c0 48 85 db 0f 85 c6 02
RSP: 0018:ffffc90005e6f7a8 EFLAGS: 00010246

RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: ffff88807d1c8000 RSI: ffffffff81b3c443 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 0000000000000080 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffc90005e6f7bf
R10: ffffffff81b3c3e1 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffffa0010e00


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ