| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220215103009.fcw4wjnpbxx5tybj@skbuf>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:30:10 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
Rafael Richter <rafael.richter@....de>,
Daniel Klauer <daniel.klauer@....de>,
Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 1/8] net: bridge: vlan: notify switchdev only
when something changed
On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 12:12:11PM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> On 15/02/2022 11:54, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 10:54:26AM +0200, Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> >>> +/* return true if anything will change as a result of __vlan_add_flags,
> >>> + * false otherwise
> >>> + */
> >>> +static bool __vlan_flags_would_change(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags)
> >>> +{
> >>> + struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
> >>> + u16 old_flags = v->flags;
> >>> + bool pvid_changed;
> >>>
> >>> - return ret || !!(old_flags ^ v->flags);
> >>> + if (br_vlan_is_master(v))
> >>> + vg = br_vlan_group(v->br);
> >>> + else
> >>> + vg = nbp_vlan_group(v->port);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID)
> >>> + pvid_changed = (vg->pvid == v->vid);
> >>> + else
> >>> + pvid_changed = (vg->pvid != v->vid);
> >>> +
> >>> + return pvid_changed || !!(old_flags ^ v->flags);
> >>> }
> >>
> >> These two have to depend on each other, otherwise it's error-prone and
> >> surely in the future someone will forget to update both.
> >> How about add a "commit" argument to __vlan_add_flags and possibly rename
> >> it to __vlan_update_flags, then add 2 small helpers like __vlan_update_flags_precommit
> >> with commit == false and __vlan_update_flags_commit with commit == true.
> >> Or some other naming, the point is to always use the same flow and checks
> >> when updating the flags to make sure people don't forget.
> >
> > You want to squash __vlan_flags_would_change() and __vlan_add_flags()
> > into a single function? But "would_change" returns bool, and "add"
> > returns void.
> >
>
> Hence the wrappers for commit == false and commit == true. You could name the precommit
> one __vlan_flags_would_change or something more appropriate. The point is to make
> sure we always update both when flags are changed.
I still have a little doubt that I understood you properly.
Do you mean like this?
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
index 1402d5ca242d..0883c11897d6 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_vlan.c
@@ -34,36 +34,32 @@ static struct net_bridge_vlan *br_vlan_lookup(struct rhashtable *tbl, u16 vid)
return rhashtable_lookup_fast(tbl, &vid, br_vlan_rht_params);
}
-static bool __vlan_add_pvid(struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg,
+static void __vlan_add_pvid(struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg,
const struct net_bridge_vlan *v)
{
if (vg->pvid == v->vid)
- return false;
+ return;
smp_wmb();
br_vlan_set_pvid_state(vg, v->state);
vg->pvid = v->vid;
-
- return true;
}
-static bool __vlan_delete_pvid(struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg, u16 vid)
+static void __vlan_delete_pvid(struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg, u16 vid)
{
if (vg->pvid != vid)
- return false;
+ return;
smp_wmb();
vg->pvid = 0;
-
- return true;
}
-/* return true if anything changed, false otherwise */
-static bool __vlan_add_flags(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags)
+/* Commit a change of flags to @v. Do not use directly, instead go through
+ * __vlan_update_flags().
+ */
+static void __vlan_add_flags(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags)
{
struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
- u16 old_flags = v->flags;
- bool ret;
if (br_vlan_is_master(v))
vg = br_vlan_group(v->br);
@@ -71,16 +67,48 @@ static bool __vlan_add_flags(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags)
vg = nbp_vlan_group(v->port);
if (flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID)
- ret = __vlan_add_pvid(vg, v);
+ __vlan_add_pvid(vg, v);
else
- ret = __vlan_delete_pvid(vg, v->vid);
+ __vlan_delete_pvid(vg, v->vid);
if (flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED)
v->flags |= BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED;
else
v->flags &= ~BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_UNTAGGED;
+}
+
+/* Return true if anything will change as a result of __vlan_add_flags(),
+ * false otherwise. Do not use directly, instead go through
+ * __vlan_update_flags().
+ */
+static bool __vlan_flags_would_change(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags)
+{
+ struct net_bridge_vlan_group *vg;
+ u16 old_flags = v->flags;
+ bool pvid_changed;
- return ret || !!(old_flags ^ v->flags);
+ if (br_vlan_is_master(v))
+ vg = br_vlan_group(v->br);
+ else
+ vg = nbp_vlan_group(v->port);
+
+ if (flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID)
+ pvid_changed = (vg->pvid != v->vid);
+ else
+ pvid_changed = (vg->pvid == v->vid);
+
+ return pvid_changed || !!(old_flags ^ v->flags);
+}
+
+static bool __vlan_update_flags(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags,
+ bool commit)
+{
+ if (!commit)
+ return __vlan_flags_would_change(v, flags);
+
+ __vlan_add_flags(v, flags);
+
+ return false;
}
static int __vlan_vid_add(struct net_device *dev, struct net_bridge *br,
@@ -310,7 +338,7 @@ static int __vlan_add(struct net_bridge_vlan *v, u16 flags,
goto out_fdb_insert;
__vlan_add_list(v);
- __vlan_add_flags(v, flags);
+ __vlan_update_flags(v, flags, true);
br_multicast_toggle_one_vlan(v, true);
if (p)
@@ -670,11 +698,15 @@ static int br_vlan_add_existing(struct net_bridge *br,
u16 flags, bool *changed,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
+ bool would_change = __vlan_update_flags(vlan, flags, false);
int err;
- err = br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(br->dev, vlan->vid, flags, extack);
- if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
- return err;
+ if (would_change) {
+ err = br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(br->dev, vlan->vid, flags,
+ extack);
+ if (err && err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ return err;
+ }
if (!br_vlan_is_brentry(vlan)) {
/* Trying to change flags of non-existent bridge vlan */
@@ -696,7 +728,8 @@ static int br_vlan_add_existing(struct net_bridge *br,
br_multicast_toggle_one_vlan(vlan, true);
}
- if (__vlan_add_flags(vlan, flags))
+ __vlan_update_flags(vlan, flags, true);
+ if (would_change)
*changed = true;
return 0;
@@ -1247,11 +1280,18 @@ int nbp_vlan_add(struct net_bridge_port *port, u16 vid, u16 flags,
*changed = false;
vlan = br_vlan_find(nbp_vlan_group(port), vid);
if (vlan) {
- /* Pass the flags to the hardware bridge */
- ret = br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(port->dev, vid, flags, extack);
- if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
- return ret;
- *changed = __vlan_add_flags(vlan, flags);
+ bool would_change = __vlan_update_flags(vlan, flags, false);
+
+ if (would_change) {
+ /* Pass the flags to the hardware bridge */
+ ret = br_switchdev_port_vlan_add(port->dev, vid,
+ flags, extack);
+ if (ret && ret != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ __vlan_update_flags(vlan, flags, true);
+ *changed = would_change;
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists