[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220215124042.186506-7-roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 13:40:42 +0100
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <ast@...nel.org>,
<daniel@...earbox.net>, <andrii@...nel.org>, <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
<revest@...omium.org>
CC: <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<bpf@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] selftests/bpf: Add test for bpf_lsm_kernel_read_file()
Test the ability of bpf_lsm_kernel_read_file() to call the sleepable
functions bpf_ima_inode_hash() or bpf_ima_file_hash() to obtain a
measurement of a loaded IMA policy.
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ima_setup.sh | 2 ++
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c | 3 +-
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ima_setup.sh b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ima_setup.sh
index 8e62581113a3..82530f19f85a 100755
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ima_setup.sh
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ima_setup.sh
@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ setup()
ensure_mount_securityfs
echo "measure func=BPRM_CHECK fsuuid=${mount_uuid}" > ${IMA_POLICY_FILE}
+ echo "measure func=BPRM_CHECK fsuuid=${mount_uuid}" > ${mount_dir}/policy_test
}
cleanup() {
@@ -74,6 +75,7 @@ run()
local mount_dir="${tmp_dir}/mnt"
local copied_bin_path="${mount_dir}/$(basename ${TEST_BINARY})"
+ echo ${mount_dir}/policy_test > ${IMA_POLICY_FILE}
exec "${copied_bin_path}"
}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c
index 62bf0e830453..c4a62d7b70df 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_ima.c
@@ -97,8 +97,9 @@ void test_test_ima(void)
/*
* 1 sample with use_ima_file_hash = false
* 2 samples with use_ima_file_hash = true (./ima_setup.sh, /bin/true)
+ * 1 sample with use_ima_file_hash = true (IMA policy)
*/
- ASSERT_EQ(err, 3, "num_samples_or_err");
+ ASSERT_EQ(err, 4, "num_samples_or_err");
ASSERT_NEQ(ima_hash_from_bpf, 0, "ima_hash");
close_clean:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c
index 9bb63f96cfc0..9b4c03f30a1c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/ima.c
@@ -20,8 +20,7 @@ char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
bool use_ima_file_hash;
-SEC("lsm.s/bprm_committed_creds")
-void BPF_PROG(ima, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+static void ima_test_common(struct file *file)
{
u64 ima_hash = 0;
u64 *sample;
@@ -31,10 +30,10 @@ void BPF_PROG(ima, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
pid = bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() >> 32;
if (pid == monitored_pid) {
if (!use_ima_file_hash)
- ret = bpf_ima_inode_hash(bprm->file->f_inode, &ima_hash,
+ ret = bpf_ima_inode_hash(file->f_inode, &ima_hash,
sizeof(ima_hash));
else
- ret = bpf_ima_file_hash(bprm->file, &ima_hash,
+ ret = bpf_ima_file_hash(file, &ima_hash,
sizeof(ima_hash));
if (ret < 0 || ima_hash == 0)
return;
@@ -49,3 +48,24 @@ void BPF_PROG(ima, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
return;
}
+
+SEC("lsm.s/bprm_committed_creds")
+void BPF_PROG(ima, struct linux_binprm *bprm)
+{
+ ima_test_common(bprm->file);
+}
+
+SEC("lsm.s/kernel_read_file")
+int BPF_PROG(kernel_read_file, struct file *file, enum kernel_read_file_id id,
+ bool contents)
+{
+ if (!contents)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (id != READING_POLICY)
+ return 0;
+
+ ima_test_common(file);
+
+ return 0;
+}
--
2.32.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists