netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: hso: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <164493601153.31968.17892021066503340871.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 14:40:11 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: hso: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when possible

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:

On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 20:09:06 +0100 you wrote:
> hso_create_device() is only called from function that already use
> GFP_KERNEL. And all the callers are called from the probe function.
> 
> So there is no need here to explicitly require a GFP_ATOMIC when
> allocating memory.
> 
> Use GFP_KERNEL instead.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - net: hso: Use GFP_KERNEL instead of GFP_ATOMIC when possible
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/25ce79db8042

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html