[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ff65255c-6380-71aa-fe43-9c1afb293ccd@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 10:16:59 +0800
From: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 4/4] vDPA/ifcvf: implement shared IRQ feature
On 2/14/2022 10:25 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 03:19:25PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> 在 2022/2/3 下午3:27, Zhu Lingshan 写道:
>>> On some platforms/devices, there may not be enough MSI vector
>>> slots allocated for virtqueues and config changes. In such a case,
>>> the interrupt sources(virtqueues, config changes) must share
>>> an IRQ/vector, to avoid initialization failures, keep
>>> the device functional.
>>>
>>> This commit handles three cases:
>>> (1) number of the allocated vectors == the number of virtqueues + 1
>>> (config changes), every virtqueue and the config interrupt has
>>> a separated vector/IRQ, the best and the most likely case.
>>> (2) number of the allocated vectors is less than the best case, but
>>> greater than 1. In this case, all virtqueues share a vector/IRQ,
>>> the config interrupt has a separated vector/IRQ
>>> (3) only one vector is allocated, in this case, the virtqueues and
>>> the config interrupt share a vector/IRQ. The worst and most
>>> unlikely case.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, it needs to fail.
>>>
>>> This commit introduces some helper functions:
>>> ifcvf_set_vq_vector() and ifcvf_set_config_vector() sets virtqueue
>>> vector and config vector in the device config space, so that
>>> the device can send interrupt DMA.
>>>
>>> This commit adds some fields in struct ifcvf_hw and re-placed
>>> the existed fields to be aligned with the cacheline.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Zhu Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c | 47 ++++--
>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h | 23 ++-
>>> drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c | 243 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>> 3 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>>> index 397692ae671c..18dcb63ab1e3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.c
>>> @@ -15,6 +15,36 @@ struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
>>> return container_of(hw, struct ifcvf_adapter, vf);
>>> }
>>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector)
>>> +{
>>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
>>> +
>>> + ifc_iowrite16(qid, &cfg->queue_select);
>>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
>>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for queue %u\n", qid);
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>
>> Let's leave this check for the caller, E.g can caller try to assign
>> NO_VECTOR during uni-nit?
>
> Hmm I'm not sure I agree. Caller will have to write queue select
> again, and that's an extra IO, which is a waste.
> And having function checking itself just seems better contained.
>
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector)
>>> +{
>>> + struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>>> + struct ifcvf_adapter *ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
>>> +
>>> + cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>>> + ifc_iowrite16(vector, &cfg->msix_config);
>>> + if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>>> + IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>
>> Similar question as above.
>>
>>
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void __iomem *get_cap_addr(struct ifcvf_hw *hw,
>>> struct virtio_pci_cap *cap)
>>> {
>>> @@ -140,6 +170,8 @@ int ifcvf_init_hw(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>> hw->common_cfg, hw->notify_base, hw->isr,
>>> hw->dev_cfg, hw->notify_off_multiplier);
>>> + hw->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -321,12 +353,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
>>> ifcvf = vf_to_adapter(hw);
>>> cfg = hw->common_cfg;
>>> - ifc_iowrite16(IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF, &cfg->msix_config);
>>> -
>>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->msix_config) == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev, "No msix vector for device config\n");
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> - }
>>> for (i = 0; i < hw->nr_vring; i++) {
>>> if (!hw->vring[i].ready)
>>> @@ -340,15 +366,6 @@ static int ifcvf_hw_enable(struct ifcvf_hw *hw)
>>> ifc_iowrite64_twopart(hw->vring[i].used, &cfg->queue_used_lo,
>>> &cfg->queue_used_hi);
>>> ifc_iowrite16(hw->vring[i].size, &cfg->queue_size);
>>> - ifc_iowrite16(i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF, &cfg->queue_msix_vector);
>>> -
>>> - if (ifc_ioread16(&cfg->queue_msix_vector) ==
>>> - VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR) {
>>> - IFCVF_ERR(ifcvf->pdev,
>>> - "No msix vector for queue %u\n", i);
>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>> - }
>>> -
>>> ifcvf_set_vq_state(hw, i, hw->vring[i].last_avail_idx);
>>> ifc_iowrite16(1, &cfg->queue_enable);
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>>> index 949b4fb9d554..9cfe088c82e9 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_base.h
>>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_ALIGNMENT PAGE_SIZE
>>> #define IFCVF_QUEUE_MAX 32768
>>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_CONFIG_OFF 0
>>> -#define IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF 1
>>> #define IFCVF_PCI_MAX_RESOURCE 6
>>> #define IFCVF_LM_CFG_SIZE 0x40
>>> @@ -42,6 +40,13 @@
>>> #define ifcvf_private_to_vf(adapter) \
>>> (&((struct ifcvf_adapter *)adapter)->vf)
>>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt has its own vector */
>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG 1
>>> +/* all vqs share a vector, and config interrupt has a separate vector */
>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG 2
>>> +/* all vqs and config interrupt share a vector */
>>> +#define MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED 3
>>
>> I think there's no much value to differ 2 from 3 consider config interrupt
>> should be rare.
>
> Yes but if we do not have a dedicated vector then we need an
> extra device IO (in fact, a read) on each interrupt.
>
>>> +
>>> static inline u8 ifc_ioread8(u8 __iomem *addr)
>>> {
>>> return ioread8(addr);
>>> @@ -97,25 +102,27 @@ struct ifcvf_hw {
>>> u8 __iomem *isr;
>>> /* Live migration */
>>> u8 __iomem *lm_cfg;
>>> - u16 nr_vring;
>>
>> Any reason for moving nv_vring, config_size, and other stuffs?
>>
>>
>>> /* Notification bar number */
>>> u8 notify_bar;
>>> + u8 msix_vector_status;
>>> + /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
>>> + u32 config_size;
>>> /* Notificaiton bar address */
>>> void __iomem *notify_base;
>>> phys_addr_t notify_base_pa;
>>> u32 notify_off_multiplier;
>>> + u32 dev_type;
>>> u64 req_features;
>>> u64 hw_features;
>>> - u32 dev_type;
>>> struct virtio_pci_common_cfg __iomem *common_cfg;
>>> void __iomem *dev_cfg;
>>> struct vring_info vring[IFCVF_MAX_QUEUES];
>>> void __iomem * const *base;
>>> char config_msix_name[256];
>>> struct vdpa_callback config_cb;
>>> - unsigned int config_irq;
>>> - /* virtio-net or virtio-blk device config size */
>>> - u32 config_size;
>>> + int config_irq;
>>> + int vqs_shared_irq;
>>> + u16 nr_vring;
>>> };
>>> struct ifcvf_adapter {
>>> @@ -160,4 +167,6 @@ int ifcvf_set_vq_state(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, u16 num);
>>> struct ifcvf_adapter *vf_to_adapter(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
>>> int ifcvf_probed_virtio_net(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
>>> u32 ifcvf_get_config_size(struct ifcvf_hw *hw);
>>> +int ifcvf_set_vq_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, u16 qid, int vector);
>>> +int ifcvf_set_config_vector(struct ifcvf_hw *hw, int vector);
>>> #endif /* _IFCVF_H_ */
>>> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>>> index 44c89ab0b6da..ca414399f040 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/ifcvf/ifcvf_main.c
>>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>> #define DRIVER_AUTHOR "Intel Corporation"
>>> #define IFCVF_DRIVER_NAME "ifcvf"
>>> +/* handles config interrupt */
>>
>> This seems unrelated to the shared IRQ logic and it looks useless since it's
>> easily to deduce it from the function name below.
>>
>>
>>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
>>> {
>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
>>> @@ -27,6 +28,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_config_changed(int irq, void *arg)
>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> }
>>> +/* handles vqs interrupt */
>>
>> So did this.
>>
>>
>>> static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>>> {
>>> struct vring_info *vring = arg;
>>> @@ -37,24 +39,78 @@ static irqreturn_t ifcvf_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>>> return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> }
>>> +/* handls vqs shared interrupt */
>>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
>>> + struct vring_info *vring;
>>> + int i;
>>> +
>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>>> + vring = &vf->vring[i];
>>> + if (vring->cb.callback)
>>> + vf->vring->cb.callback(vring->cb.private);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +/* handles a shared interrupt for vqs and config */
>>> +static irqreturn_t ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler(int irq, void *arg)
> shared is not a good name given IRQ_SHARED is not set.
> maybe "common"? "reused"?
Sure, I can do better naming
Thanks
>
>>> +{
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = arg;
>>> + u8 isr;
>>> +
>>> + isr = ifc_ioread8(vf->isr);
>>
>> We need to exactly what vp_interrupt do here. Checking against vf->isr first
>> and return IRQ_NONE if it is not set.
> no, vf->isr is not set for VQ interrupts. If need to actually poke
> at the VQ to know.
>
>> Always return IRQ_HANDLED will break the device who shares an irq with
>> IFCVF.
>
> It's a MSI, not INT#. So interrupt is not shared as such - it's only
> sharing vector between config and vq.
>
>
>>> + if (isr & VIRTIO_PCI_ISR_CONFIG)
>>> + ifcvf_config_changed(irq, arg);
>>> +
>>> + return ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler(irq, arg);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static void ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
>>> {
>>> pci_free_irq_vectors(data);
>>> }
>>> -static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
>>> +static void ifcvf_free_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> int i;
>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG) {
>>> + for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> + } else {
>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vqs_shared_irq, vf);
>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>> - for (i = 0; i < queues; i++) {
>>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->vring[i].irq, &vf->vring[i]);
>>> - vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>>> +static void ifcvf_free_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> +
>>> + /* If the irq is shared by all vqs and the config interrupt,
>>> + * it is already freed in ifcvf_free_vq_irq, so here only
>>> + * need to free config irq when msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED
>>> + */
>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status != MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED) {
>>> + devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
>>> + vf->config_irq = -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void ifcvf_free_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter, int queues)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> - devm_free_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq, vf);
>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, queues);
>>> + ifcvf_free_config_irq(adapter);
>>> ifcvf_free_irq_vectors(pdev);
>>> }
>>> @@ -86,58 +142,172 @@ static int ifcvf_alloc_vectors(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> -static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +static int ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> {
>>> struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> - int vector, nvectors, i, ret, irq;
>>> - u16 max_intr;
>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>>> - nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
>>> - if (!(nvectors > 0))
>>> - return nvectors;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n", pci_name(pdev), i);
>>> + vector = i;
>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>>> + ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
>>> + vf->vring[i].msix_name,
>>> + &vf->vring[i]);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, i);
>>> + } else {
>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
>>> + }
>>> + }
>>> - max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>>> +
>>> + vector = 0;
>>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared vqs interrupt name */
>>
>> I think we can remove this comment since the code is straightforward.
>>
>>
>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-vqs-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>>> + ifcvf_vq_shared_intr_handler, 0,
>>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> + int i, vector, ret, irq;
>>> +
>>> + vector = 0;
>>> + /* reuse msix_name[256] space of vring0 to store shared device interrupt name */
>>> + snprintf(vf->vring[0].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-dev-shared-irq\n", pci_name(pdev));
>>> + irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>>> + ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>>> + ifcvf_dev_shared_intr_handler, 0,
>>> + vf->vring[0].msix_name, vf);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request shared irq for vf\n");
>>> - ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, max_intr,
>>> - max_intr, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
>>> - if (ret < 0) {
>>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to alloc IRQ vectors\n");
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> + vf->vqs_shared_irq = irq;
>>> + for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>>> + vf->vring[i].irq = -EINVAL;
>>> + ifcvf_set_vq_vector(vf, i, vector);
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + vf->config_irq = irq;
>>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, vector);
>>> +
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ifcvf_request_vq_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_per_vq_irq(adapter);
>>> + else
>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_shared_vq_irq(adapter);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ifcvf_request_config_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>> + struct pci_dev *pdev = adapter->pdev;
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> + int config_vector, ret;
>>> +
>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED)
>>> + return 0;
>>> +
>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
>>> + /* vector 0 ~ vf->nr_vring for vqs, num vf->nr_vring vector for config interrupt */
>>> + config_vector = vf->nr_vring;
>>> +
>>> + if (vf->msix_vector_status == MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG)
>>> + /* vector 0 for vqs and 1 for config interrupt */
>>> + config_vector = 1;
>>> +
>>> snprintf(vf->config_msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-config\n",
>>> pci_name(pdev));
>>> - vector = 0;
>>> - vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>>> + vf->config_irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, config_vector);
>>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, vf->config_irq,
>>> ifcvf_config_changed, 0,
>>> vf->config_msix_name, vf);
>>> if (ret) {
>>> IFCVF_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request config irq\n");
>>> + ifcvf_free_vq_irq(adapter, vf->nr_vring);
>>> return ret;
>>> }
>>> - for (i = 0; i < vf->nr_vring; i++) {
>>> - snprintf(vf->vring[i].msix_name, 256, "ifcvf[%s]-%d\n",
>>> - pci_name(pdev), i);
>>> - vector = i + IFCVF_MSI_QUEUE_OFF;
>>> - irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, vector);
>>> - ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq,
>>> - ifcvf_intr_handler, 0,
>>> - vf->vring[i].msix_name,
>>> - &vf->vring[i]);
>>> - if (ret) {
>>> - IFCVF_ERR(pdev,
>>> - "Failed to request irq for vq %d\n", i);
>>> - ifcvf_free_irq(adapter, i);
>>> + ifcvf_set_config_vector(vf, config_vector);
>>> - return ret;
>>> - }
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int ifcvf_request_irq(struct ifcvf_adapter *adapter)
>>> +{
>>
>> As replied above, I think having two modes should be sufficient and the code
>> could be greatly simplified.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
> Well it is claimed there are platforms where we are short
> on vectors. 3 versus 2 seems a 50% saving. You disagree?
>
>>> + struct ifcvf_hw *vf = &adapter->vf;
>>> + int nvectors, ret, max_intr;
>>> - vf->vring[i].irq = irq;
>>> + nvectors = ifcvf_alloc_vectors(adapter);
>>> + if (!(nvectors > 0))
>>> + return nvectors;
>>> +
>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_PER_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
>>> + max_intr = vf->nr_vring + 1;
>>> + if (nvectors < max_intr)
>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_SHARED_VQ_AND_CONFIG;
>>> +
>>> + if (nvectors == 1) {
>>> + vf->msix_vector_status = MSIX_VECTOR_DEV_SHARED;
>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_dev_shared_irq(adapter);
>>> +
>>> + return ret;
>>> }
>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_vq_irq(adapter);
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> + ret = ifcvf_request_config_irq(adapter);
>>> +
>>> + if (ret)
>>> + return ret;
>>> +
>>> return 0;
>>> }
>>> @@ -441,7 +611,10 @@ static int ifcvf_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
>>> {
>>> struct ifcvf_hw *vf = vdpa_to_vf(vdpa_dev);
>>> - return vf->vring[qid].irq;
>>> + if (vf->vqs_shared_irq < 0)
>>> + return vf->vring[qid].irq;
>>> + else
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> }
>>> static struct vdpa_notification_area ifcvf_get_vq_notification(struct vdpa_device *vdpa_dev,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists