lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:47:01 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To:     Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Menglong Dong <menglong8.dong@...il.com>
Cc:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Menglong Dong <imagedong@...cent.com>,
        Talal Ahmad <talalahmad@...gle.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
        Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@...me>,
        Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
        Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Yajun Deng <yajun.deng@...ux.dev>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
        Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
        Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>,
        Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.von.dentz@...el.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        flyingpeng@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/19] net: tcp: introduce tcp_drop_reason()

On 2/15/22 10:34 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> index af94a6d22a9d..e3811afd1756 100644
>> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
>> @@ -4684,10 +4684,19 @@ static bool tcp_ooo_try_coalesce(struct sock *sk,
>>         return res;
>>  }
>>
>> -static void tcp_drop(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
>> +static void tcp_drop_reason(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
>> +                           enum skb_drop_reason reason)
>>  {
>>         sk_drops_add(sk, skb);
>> -       __kfree_skb(skb);
>> +       /* why __kfree_skb() used here before, other than kfree_skb()?
>> +        * confusing......
> 
> Do not add comments like that if you do not know the difference...
> 
> __kfree_skb() is used by TCP stack because it owns skb in receive
> queues, and avoids touching skb->users
> because it must be one already.

and it bypasses kfree_skb tracepoint which seems by design.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ