netdev - [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: lan966x: remove guards against !BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 16 Feb 2022 18:47:49 +0200
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>,
        Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>,
        Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        Lars Povlsen <lars.povlsen@...rochip.com>,
        Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@...rochip.com>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Karsten Graul <kgraul@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 2/5] net: lan966x: remove guards against !BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY

Since commit 3116ad0696dd ("net: bridge: vlan: don't notify to switchdev
master VLANs without BRENTRY flag"), the bridge no longer emits
switchdev notifiers for VLANs that don't have the
BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY flag, so these checks are dead code.
Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
---
 .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c   | 12 ------------
 1 file changed, 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c
index 9fce865287e7..85099a51d4c7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_switchdev.c
@@ -463,18 +463,6 @@ static int lan966x_handle_port_vlan_add(struct lan966x_port *port,
 	const struct switchdev_obj_port_vlan *v = SWITCHDEV_OBJ_PORT_VLAN(obj);
 	struct lan966x *lan966x = port->lan966x;
 
-	/* When adding a port to a vlan, we get a callback for the port but
-	 * also for the bridge. When get the callback for the bridge just bail
-	 * out. Then when the bridge is added to the vlan, then we get a
-	 * callback here but in this case the flags has set:
-	 * BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY. In this case it means that the CPU
-	 * port is added to the vlan, so the broadcast frames and unicast frames
-	 * with dmac of the bridge should be foward to CPU.
-	 */
-	if (netif_is_bridge_master(obj->orig_dev) &&
-	    !(v->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_BRENTRY))
-		return 0;
-
 	if (!netif_is_bridge_master(obj->orig_dev))
 		lan966x_vlan_port_add_vlan(port, v->vid,
 					   v->flags & BRIDGE_VLAN_INFO_PVID,
-- 
2.25.1