[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220216171602.GA10877@willie-the-truck>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 17:16:02 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@...hat.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/4] arm64: insn: add encoders for atomic
operations
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 03:39:48PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 1/29/22 11:04 PM, Hou Tao wrote:
> > It is a preparation patch for eBPF atomic supports under arm64. eBPF
> > needs support atomic[64]_fetch_add, atomic[64]_[fetch_]{and,or,xor} and
> > atomic[64]_{xchg|cmpxchg}. The ordering semantics of eBPF atomics are
> > the same with the implementations in linux kernel.
> >
> > Add three helpers to support LDCLR/LDEOR/LDSET/SWP, CAS and DMB
> > instructions. STADD/STCLR/STEOR/STSET are simply encoded as aliases for
> > LDADD/LDCLR/LDEOR/LDSET with XZR as the destination register, so no extra
> > helper is added. atomic_fetch_add() and other atomic ops needs support for
> > STLXR instruction, so extend enum aarch64_insn_ldst_type to do that.
> >
> > LDADD/LDEOR/LDSET/SWP and CAS instructions are only available when LSE
> > atomics is enabled, so just return AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT directly in
> > these newly-added helpers if CONFIG_ARM64_LSE_ATOMICS is disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>
>
> Hey Mark / Ard / Will / Catalin or others, could we get an Ack on patch 1 & 2
> at min if it looks good to you?
I checked the instruction encodings in patches 1 and 2 and they all look
fine to me. However, after applying those two locally I get a build failure:
| In file included from arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:23:
| arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: In function ‘build_insn’:
| arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h:94:2: error: implicit declaration of function ‘aarch64_insn_gen_stadd’; did you mean ‘aarch64_insn_gen_adr’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
| 94 | aarch64_insn_gen_stadd(Rn, Rs, A64_SIZE(sf))
| | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
| arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c:912:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘A64_STADD’
| 912 | emit(A64_STADD(isdw, reg, src), ctx);
| | ^~~~~~~~~
| cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists