lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:38:15 +0800
From:   Heyi Guo <guoheyi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Dylan Hung <dylan_hung@...eedtech.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Issue report] drivers/ftgmac100: DHCP occasionally fails during
 boot up or link down/up

Thanks for your advice; I'll take try :)

Heyi


在 2022/2/16 上午4:50, Andrew Lunn 写道:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 02:38:51PM +0800, Heyi Guo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We are using Aspeed 2600 and found DHCP occasionally fails during boot up or
>> link down/up. The DHCP client is systemd 247.6 networkd. Our network device
>> is 2600 MAC4 connected to a RGMII PHY module.
>>
>> Current investigation shows the first DHCP discovery packet sent by
>> systemd-networkd might be corrupted, and sysmtemd-networkd will continue to
>> send DHCP discovery packets with the same XID, but no other packets, as
>> there is no IP obtained at the moment. However the server side will not
>> respond with this serial of DHCP requests, until it receives some other
>> packets. This situation can be recovered by another link down/up, or a "ping
>> -I eth0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" command to insert some other TX packets.
>>
>> Navigating the driver code ftgmac.c, I've some question about the work flow
>> from link down to link up. I think the flow is as below:
>>
>> 1. ftgmac100_open() will enable net interface with ftgmac100_init_all(), and
>> then call phy_start()
>>
>> 2. When PHY is link up, it will call netif_carrier_on() and then adjust_link
>> interface, which is ftgmac100_adjust_link() for ftgmac100
> The order there is questionable. Maybe it should first call the adjust
> link callback, and then the netif_carrier_on(). However...
>
>> 3. In ftgmac100_adjust_link(), it will schedule the reset work
>> (ftgmac100_reset_task)
>>
>> 4. ftgmac100_reset_task() will then reset the MAC
> Because of this delayed reset, changing the order will not help this
> driver.
>
>> I found networkd will start to send DHCP request immediately after
>> netif_carrier_on() called in step 2, but step 4 will reset the MAC, which
>> may potentially corrupt the sending packet.
> What is not clear to my is why it is scheduling the work rather than
> just doing it. At least for adjust_link, it is in a context it can
> sleep. ftgmac100_set_ringparam() should also be able to
> sleep. ftgmac100_interrupt() cannot sleep, so it does need to schedule
> work.
>
> I would suggest you refactor ftgmac100_reset_task() into a function
> that actually does the reset, and a wrapper which takes a
> work_struct. adjust_link can then directly do the reset, which
> probably solves your problem.

> 	 Andrew

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ