[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220217113439.GE4665@corigine.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 12:34:39 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Jianbo Liu <jianbol@...dia.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, olteanv@...il.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...il.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, rajur@...lsio.com,
claudiu.manoil@....com, sgoutham@...vell.com, gakula@...vell.com,
sbhatta@...vell.com, hkelam@...vell.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
leon@...nel.org, idosch@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
baowen.zheng@...igine.com, louis.peens@...ronome.com,
peng.zhang@...igine.com, oss-drivers@...igine.com, roid@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] flow_offload: add tc police parameters
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:28:01AM +0000, Jianbo Liu wrote:
> As a preparation for more advanced police offload in mlx5 (e.g.,
> jumping to another chain when bandwidth is not exceeded), extend the
> flow offload API with more tc-police parameters. Adjust existing
> drivers to reject unsupported configurations.
Hi,
I have a concern that
a) patch 1 introduces a facility that may break existing drivers; and
b) patch 2 then fixes this
I'd slightly prefer if the series was rearranged to avoid this problem.
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists