[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8863.1645071997@famine>
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2022 20:26:37 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...dia.com>,
Jonathan Toppins <jtoppins@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 5/5] bonding: add new option ns_ip6_target
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>On 2/16/22 6:25 PM, Hangbin Liu wrote:
> > For Bonding I think yes. Bonding has disallowed to config via
>module_param.
>> But there are still users using sysfs for bonding configuration.
>>
>> Jay, Veaceslav, please correct me if you think we can stop using sysfs.
>>
>
>new features, new API only?
I'm in agreement with this. I see no reason not to encourage
standardization on iproute / netlink.
-J
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists