[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7f5341e5-9d00-fca6-9def-b78282fc86ba@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 11:32:03 +0100
From: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@...el.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 6/9] drm/i915: Separate wakeref tracking
On 17.02.2022 15:48, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 03:04:38PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> -static noinline depot_stack_handle_t
>> +static intel_wakeref_t
>> track_intel_runtime_pm_wakeref(struct intel_runtime_pm *rpm)
>> {
>> - depot_stack_handle_t stack, *stacks;
>> - unsigned long flags;
>> -
>> - if (rpm->no_wakeref_tracking)
>> - return -1;
>> -
>> - stack = __save_depot_stack();
>> - if (!stack)
>> + if (!rpm->available)
>> return -1;
> no_wakeref_tracking != available
ups I missed this change, will be more careful in next iteration.
Regards
Andrzej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists