[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yg98Zjikg0ncQv8b@kroah.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 12:00:54 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@...e.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fix scan with WFM200 and WW regulation
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:57:47AM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> On Friday 18 February 2022 11:53:58 CET Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > From: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@...e.com>
> >
> > Some variants of the WF200 disallow active scan on channel 12 and 13.
> > For these parts, the channels 12 and 13 are marked IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR.
> >
> > However, the beacon hint procedure was removing the flag
> > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR from channels where a BSS is discovered. This was
> > making subsequent scans to fail because the driver was trying active
> > scans on prohibited channels.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
>
> I forgot to mention I have reviewed on this patch:
>
> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Reviwed-by is implied with signed-off-by.
But what happened to the signed-off-by from the author of this change?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists