netdev - Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fix scan with WFM200 and WW regulation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3633390.6h3MoT29mx@pc-42>
Date:   Fri, 18 Feb 2022 15:04:48 +0100
From:   Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@...e.com>
Cc:     "linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: wfx: fix scan with WFM200 and WW regulation

Hello Riccardo,


On Friday 18 February 2022 14:53:35 CET Riccardo Ferrazzo wrote:
> 
> Signed-off-by: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@...e.com>
> 
> 
> Sorry for the footer it is added automatically
> 

Your mail has probably not been received by everyone since you sent it
in html[1] (try also to avoid top-posting).

Nevertheless, Greg, is it sufficient for you?

[1]: https://useplaintext.email/

> On Friday 18 February 2022 12:00:54 CET Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 11:57:47AM +0100, Jérôme Pouiller wrote:
> > > On Friday 18 February 2022 11:53:58 CET Jerome Pouiller wrote:
> > > > From: Riccardo Ferrazzo <rferrazzo@...e.com>
> > > >
> > > > Some variants of the WF200 disallow active scan on channel 12 and 13.
> > > > For these parts, the channels 12 and 13 are marked IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR.
> > > >
> > > > However, the beacon hint procedure was removing the flag
> > > > IEEE80211_CHAN_NO_IR from channels where a BSS is discovered. This was
> > > > making subsequent scans to fail because the driver was trying active
> > > > scans on prohibited channels.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> > >
> > > I forgot to mention I have reviewed on this patch:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
> >
> > Reviwed-by is implied with signed-off-by.
> >
> > But what happened to the signed-off-by from the author of this change?
> 
> The author hasn't used format-patch to transmit this patch.
> 
> Riccardo, can you reply to this mail with the mention "Signed-off-by:
> Your name <your-mail@....com>"? It certifies that you wrote it or
> otherwise have the right to pass it on as an open-source patch[1].
> 
> 
> [1]  https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fv4.17%2Fprocess%2Fsubmitting-patches.html%23sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin&e=09733f94&h=e09f2efa&f=y&p=n<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urlsand.esvalabs.com/?u=https*3A*2F*2Fwww.kernel.org*2Fdoc*2Fhtml*2Fv4.17*2Fprocess*2Fsubmitting-patches.html*23sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin&e=09733f94&h=e09f2efa&f=y&p=n__;JSUlJSUlJSUl!!N30Cs7Jr!GRgB_JlhZF2XzaDEB1ZDnSbLiMmD8XdrmC_uqyLoczR5e05vvMlDCgyKlEu3XyI3PdJK$>
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> --
> Jérôme Pouiller
> 
> 
> 


-- 
Jérôme Pouiller