[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220219070810.GD26505@lst.de>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2022 08:08:10 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hch@....de, cl@...ux.com,
42.hyeyoo@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org, rientjes@...gle.com,
iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, David.Laight@...LAB.COM,
david@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, davem@...emloft.net,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, steffen.klassert@...unet.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, michael@...le.cc,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, wsa@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] drm/sti: Don't use GFP_DMA when calling
dma_alloc_wc()
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 08:52:03AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> dma_alloc_wc() allocates dma buffer with device's addressing
> limitation in mind. It's redundent to specify GFP_DMA when calling
> dma_alloc_wc().
Looks good:
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists