netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] netfilter: flowtable: Support GRE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Feb 2022 21:51:37 +0900
From:   Toshiaki Makita <toshiaki.makita1@...il.com>
To:     Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
        Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
        Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
        Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, coreteam@...filter.org,
        Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] netfilter: flowtable: Support GRE

Ping, Pablo?

On 2022/02/12 10:54, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
> On 2022/02/09 19:01, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 11:30:03PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>>> On 2022/02/08 2:56, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 08:59:39PM +0900, Toshiaki Makita wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
>>>>> index 889cf88..48e2f58 100644
>>>>> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
>>>>> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_flow_table_ip.c
>> [...]
>>>>> @@ -202,15 +209,25 @@ static int nf_flow_tuple_ip(struct sk_buff *skb, const 
>>>>> struct net_device *dev,
>>>>>        if (!pskb_may_pull(skb, thoff + *hdrsize))
>>>>>            return -1;
>>>>> +    if (ipproto == IPPROTO_GRE) {
>>>>
>>>> No ifdef here? Maybe remove these ifdef everywhere?
>>>
>>> I wanted to avoid adding many ifdefs and I expect this to be compiled out
>>> when CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_GRE=n as this block is unreachable anyway. It rather
>>> may have been unintuitive though.
>>>
>>> Removing all of these ifdefs will cause inconsistent behavior between
>>> CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_GRE=n/y.
>>> When CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_GRE=n, conntrack cannot determine GRE version, thus
>>> it will track GREv1 without key infomation, and the flow will be offloaded.
>>> When CONFIG_NF_CT_PROTO_GRE=y, GREv1 will have key information and will not
>>> be offloaded.
>>> I wanted to just refuse offloading of GRE to avoid this inconsistency.
>>> Anyway this kind of inconsistency seems to happen in software conntrack, so
>>> if you'd like to remove ifdefs, I will do.
>>
>> Good point, thanks for explaining. LGTM.
> 
> Let me confirm, did you agree to keep ifdefs, or delete them?
> 
> Toshiaki Makita