lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220220134813.3411982-7-memxor@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 20 Feb 2022 19:18:04 +0530
From:   Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
To:     bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
        netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 06/15] bpf: Allow storing __user PTR_TO_BTF_ID in map

Recently, verifier gained __user annotation support [0] where it
prevents BPF program from normally derefering user memory pointer in the
kernel, and instead requires use of bpf_probe_read_user. We can allow
the user to also store these pointers in BPF maps, with the logic that
whenever user loads it from the BPF map, it gets marked as MEM_USER.

  [0]: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220127154555.650886-1-yhs@fb.com

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h   |  1 +
 kernel/bpf/btf.c      | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 843c8c01cf9d..37ca92f4c7b7 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ enum {
 enum {
 	BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_REF    = (1U << 0),
 	BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU = (1U << 1),
+	BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_USER   = (1U << 2),
 };
 
 struct bpf_map_value_off_desc {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
index eb57584ee0a8..bafceae90c32 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c
@@ -3146,7 +3146,7 @@ static s32 btf_find_by_name_kind_all(const char *name, u32 kind, struct btf **bt
 static int btf_find_field_kptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 			       u32 off, int sz, void *data)
 {
-	bool btf_id_tag = false, ref_tag = false, percpu_tag = false;
+	bool btf_id_tag = false, ref_tag = false, percpu_tag = false, user_tag = false;
 	struct bpf_map_value_off *tab;
 	struct bpf_map *map = data;
 	int nr_off, ret, flags = 0;
@@ -3181,6 +3181,13 @@ static int btf_find_field_kptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 				goto end;
 			}
 			percpu_tag = true;
+		} else if (!strcmp("kernel.bpf.user", __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off))) {
+			/* repeated tag */
+			if (user_tag) {
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				goto end;
+			}
+			user_tag = true;
 		} else if (!strncmp("kernel.", __btf_name_by_offset(btf, t->name_off),
 			   sizeof("kernel.") - 1)) {
 			/* TODO: Should we reject these when loading BTF? */
@@ -3192,15 +3199,16 @@ static int btf_find_field_kptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 		t = btf_type_by_id(btf, t->type);
 	}
 	if (!btf_id_tag) {
-		/* 'ref' or 'percpu' tag must be specified together with 'btf_id' tag */
-		if (ref_tag || percpu_tag) {
+		/* 'ref', 'percpu', 'user' tag must be specified together with 'btf_id' tag */
+		if (ref_tag || percpu_tag || user_tag) {
 			ret = -EINVAL;
 			goto end;
 		}
 		return 0;
 	}
-	/* referenced percpu btf_id pointer is not yet supported */
-	if (ref_tag && percpu_tag) {
+	/* All three are mutually exclusive */
+	ret = ref_tag + percpu_tag + user_tag;
+	if (ret > 1) {
 		ret = -EINVAL;
 		goto end;
 	}
@@ -3257,6 +3265,8 @@ static int btf_find_field_kptr(const struct btf *btf, const struct btf_type *t,
 		flags |= BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_REF;
 	else if (percpu_tag)
 		flags |= BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU;
+	else if (user_tag)
+		flags |= BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_USER;
 
 	tab->off[nr_off].offset = off;
 	tab->off[nr_off].btf_id = id;
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 00d6ab49033d..28da858bb921 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -3482,7 +3482,11 @@ static int map_ptr_to_btf_id_match_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 	enum bpf_reg_type reg_type;
 	const char *reg_name = "";
 
-	if (off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU) {
+	if (off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_USER) {
+		if (reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | MEM_USER) &&
+		    reg->type != (PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_USER))
+			goto end;
+	} else if (off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU) {
 		if (reg->type != PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID &&
 		    reg->type != (PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL))
 			goto end;
@@ -3536,7 +3540,9 @@ static int map_ptr_to_btf_id_match_type(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
 
 	return 0;
 end:
-	if (off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU)
+	if (off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_USER)
+		reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL | MEM_USER;
+	else if (off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU)
 		reg_type = PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
 	else
 		reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID | PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
@@ -3556,14 +3562,14 @@ static int check_map_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int
 				   struct bpf_reg_state *atomic_load_reg)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *reg = reg_state(env, regno), *val_reg;
+	bool ref_ptr = false, percpu_ptr = false, user_ptr = false;
 	struct bpf_insn *insn = &env->prog->insnsi[insn_idx];
 	enum bpf_reg_type reg_type = PTR_TO_BTF_ID;
-	bool ref_ptr = false, percpu_ptr = false;
 	struct bpf_map_value_off_desc *off_desc;
 	int insn_class = BPF_CLASS(insn->code);
+	int ret, reg_flags = PTR_MAYBE_NULL;
 	struct bpf_map *map = reg->map_ptr;
 	u32 ref_obj_id = 0;
-	int ret;
 
 	/* Things we already checked for in check_map_access:
 	 *  - Reject cases where variable offset may touch BTF ID pointer
@@ -3590,8 +3596,11 @@ static int check_map_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int
 
 	ref_ptr = off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_REF;
 	percpu_ptr = off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_PERCPU;
+	user_ptr = off_desc->flags & BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_F_USER;
 	if (percpu_ptr)
 		reg_type = PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID;
+	else if (user_ptr)
+		reg_flags |= MEM_USER;
 
 	if (is_xchg_insn(insn)) {
 		/* We do checks and updates during register fill call for fetch case */
@@ -3623,7 +3632,7 @@ static int check_map_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int
 		}
 		/* val_reg might be NULL at this point */
 		mark_btf_ld_reg(env, cur_regs(env), value_regno, reg_type, off_desc->btf,
-				off_desc->btf_id, PTR_MAYBE_NULL);
+				off_desc->btf_id, reg_flags);
 		/* __mark_ptr_or_null_regs needs ref_obj_id == id to clear
 		 * reference state for ptr == NULL branch.
 		 */
@@ -3641,7 +3650,7 @@ static int check_map_ptr_to_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int
 		 * value from map as PTR_TO_BTF_ID, with the correct type.
 		 */
 		mark_btf_ld_reg(env, cur_regs(env), value_regno, reg_type, off_desc->btf,
-				off_desc->btf_id, PTR_MAYBE_NULL);
+				off_desc->btf_id, reg_flags);
 		val_reg->id = ++env->id_gen;
 	} else if (insn_class == BPF_STX) {
 		if (WARN_ON_ONCE(value_regno < 0))
-- 
2.35.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ