netdev - Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: don't check owner in vhost_vsock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220221094829-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
Date:   Mon, 21 Feb 2022 10:03:39 -0500
From:   "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To:     Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Mike Christie <michael.christie@...cle.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Asias He <asias@...hat.com>,
        virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost/vsock: don't check owner in vhost_vsock_stop()
 while releasing

On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 12:49:16PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> vhost_vsock_stop() calls vhost_dev_check_owner() to check the device
> ownership. It expects current->mm to be valid.
> 
> vhost_vsock_stop() is also called by vhost_vsock_dev_release() when
> the user has not done close(), so when we are in do_exit(). In this
> case current->mm is invalid and we're releasing the device, so we
> should clean it anyway.
> 
> Let's check the owner only when vhost_vsock_stop() is called
> by an ioctl.




> Fixes: 433fc58e6bf2 ("VSOCK: Introduce vhost_vsock.ko")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Reported-by: syzbot+1e3ea63db39f2b4440e0@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 14 ++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> index d6ca1c7ad513..f00d2dfd72b7 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vsock.c
> @@ -629,16 +629,18 @@ static int vhost_vsock_start(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock)
> +static int vhost_vsock_stop(struct vhost_vsock *vsock, bool check_owner)

>  {
>  	size_t i;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	mutex_lock(&vsock->dev.mutex);
>  
> -	ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&vsock->dev);
> -	if (ret)
> -		goto err;
> +	if (check_owner) {
> +		ret = vhost_dev_check_owner(&vsock->dev);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err;
> +	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(vsock->vqs); i++) {
>  		struct vhost_virtqueue *vq = &vsock->vqs[i];
> @@ -753,7 +755,7 @@ static int vhost_vsock_dev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
>  	 * inefficient.  Room for improvement here. */
>  	vsock_for_each_connected_socket(vhost_vsock_reset_orphans);
>  
> -	vhost_vsock_stop(vsock);

Let's add an explanation:

When invoked from release we can not fail so we don't
check return code of vhost_vsock_stop.
We need to stop vsock even if it's not the owner.

> +	vhost_vsock_stop(vsock, false);
>  	vhost_vsock_flush(vsock);
>  	vhost_dev_stop(&vsock->dev);
>  
> @@ -868,7 +870,7 @@ static long vhost_vsock_dev_ioctl(struct file *f, unsigned int ioctl,
>  		if (start)
>  			return vhost_vsock_start(vsock);
>  		else
> -			return vhost_vsock_stop(vsock);
> +			return vhost_vsock_stop(vsock, true);
>  	case VHOST_GET_FEATURES:
>  		features = VHOST_VSOCK_FEATURES;
>  		if (copy_to_user(argp, &features, sizeof(features)))
> -- 
> 2.35.1