[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YhPdAeNwgffXqvfO@salvia>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 19:42:09 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Woody Suwalski <wsuwalski@...il.com>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 5.17-rc5
On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:28:46AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:25 AM Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:21:16AM -0800, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:08 AM Linus Torvalds
> > > <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 10:02 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I am pretty sure Pablo fixed this one week ago.
> > > >
> > > > .. looks about right. Apart from the "it was never sent to me, so -rc5
> > > > ended up showing the problem" part.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Indeed, I personally these kinds of trivial fixes should be sent right away,
> > > especially considering two bots complained about it.
> >
> > I did not consider this so important, that was my fault.
>
> Well, I was the one adding this compile error ;)
I poorly performed as a duly reviewer :)
> Testing CONFIG_IPV6=n builds is not my top priority.
For the record, this patch is now flying to the netdev tree via pull request:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220221161757.250801-1-pablo@netfilter.org/
Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists