[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220222134251.GA2271@kili>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 16:42:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] udp_tunnel: Fix end of loop test in
udp_tunnel_nic_unregister()
This test is checking if we exited the list via break or not. However
if it did not exit via a break then "node" does not point to a valid
udp_tunnel_nic_shared_node struct. It will work because of the way
the structs are laid out it's the equivalent of
"if (info->shared->udp_tunnel_nic_info != dev)" which will always be
true, but it's not the right way to test.
Fixes: 74cc6d182d03 ("udp_tunnel: add the ability to share port tables")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
---
net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c b/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c
index b91003538d87..bc3a043a5d5c 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp_tunnel_nic.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ udp_tunnel_nic_unregister(struct net_device *dev, struct udp_tunnel_nic *utn)
list_for_each_entry(node, &info->shared->devices, list)
if (node->dev == dev)
break;
- if (node->dev != dev)
+ if (list_entry_is_head(node, &info->shared->devices, list))
return;
list_del(&node->list);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists