lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164556001034.16898.17296775826071482460.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 22 Feb 2022 20:00:10 +0000
From:   patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next] gro_cells: avoid using synchronize_rcu() in
 gro_cells_destroy()

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Sat, 19 Feb 2022 20:11:55 -0800 you wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> 
> Another thing making netns dismantles potentially very slow is located
> in gro_cells_destroy(),
> whenever cleanup_net() has to remove a device using gro_cells framework.
> 
> RTNL is not held at this stage, so synchronize_net()
> is calling synchronize_rcu():
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v2,net-next] gro_cells: avoid using synchronize_rcu() in gro_cells_destroy()
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ee8f97efa7a5

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ