| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220222070405.i6esgcf7ouqrmoef@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2022 23:04:05 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 08/15] bpf: Adapt copy_map_value for multiple
offset case
On Sun, Feb 20, 2022 at 07:18:06PM +0530, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi wrote:
> The changes in this patch deserve closer look, so it has been split into
> its own independent patch. While earlier we just had to skip two objects
> at most while copying in and out of map, now we have potentially many
> objects (at most 8 + 2 = 10, due to the BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_MAX limit).
>
> Hence, divide the copy_map_value function into an inlined fast path and
> function call to slowpath. The slowpath handles the case of > 3 offsets,
> while we handle the most common cases (0, 1, 2, or 3 offsets) in the
> inline function itself.
>
> In copy_map_value_slow, we use 11 offsets, just to make the for loop
> that copies the value free of edge cases for the last offset, by using
> map->value_size as final offset to subtract remaining area to copy from.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/bpf.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 95 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> index ae599aaf8d4c..5d845ca02eba 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -253,12 +253,22 @@ static inline void check_and_init_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst)
> memset(dst + map->spin_lock_off, 0, sizeof(struct bpf_spin_lock));
> if (unlikely(map_value_has_timer(map)))
> memset(dst + map->timer_off, 0, sizeof(struct bpf_timer));
> + if (unlikely(map_value_has_ptr_to_btf_id(map))) {
> + struct bpf_map_value_off *tab = map->ptr_off_tab;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < tab->nr_off; i++)
> + *(u64 *)(dst + tab->off[i].offset) = 0;
> + }
> }
>
> +void copy_map_value_slow(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src, u32 s_off,
> + u32 s_sz, u32 t_off, u32 t_sz);
> +
> /* copy everything but bpf_spin_lock and bpf_timer. There could be one of each. */
> static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
> {
> - u32 s_off = 0, s_sz = 0, t_off = 0, t_sz = 0;
> + u32 s_off = 0, s_sz = 0, t_off = 0, t_sz = 0, p_off = 0, p_sz = 0;
>
> if (unlikely(map_value_has_spin_lock(map))) {
> s_off = map->spin_lock_off;
> @@ -268,13 +278,40 @@ static inline void copy_map_value(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src)
> t_off = map->timer_off;
> t_sz = sizeof(struct bpf_timer);
> }
> + /* Multiple offset case is slow, offload to function */
> + if (unlikely(map_value_has_ptr_to_btf_id(map))) {
> + struct bpf_map_value_off *tab = map->ptr_off_tab;
> +
> + /* Inline the likely common case */
> + if (likely(tab->nr_off == 1)) {
> + p_off = tab->off[0].offset;
> + p_sz = sizeof(u64);
> + } else {
> + copy_map_value_slow(map, dst, src, s_off, s_sz, t_off, t_sz);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (unlikely(s_sz || t_sz || p_sz)) {
> + /* The order is p_off, t_off, s_off, use insertion sort */
>
> - if (unlikely(s_sz || t_sz)) {
> + if (t_off < p_off || !t_sz) {
> + swap(t_off, p_off);
> + swap(t_sz, p_sz);
> + }
> if (s_off < t_off || !s_sz) {
> swap(s_off, t_off);
> swap(s_sz, t_sz);
> + if (t_off < p_off || !t_sz) {
> + swap(t_off, p_off);
> + swap(t_sz, p_sz);
> + }
> }
> - memcpy(dst, src, t_off);
> +
> + memcpy(dst, src, p_off);
> + memcpy(dst + p_off + p_sz,
> + src + p_off + p_sz,
> + t_off - p_off - p_sz);
> memcpy(dst + t_off + t_sz,
> src + t_off + t_sz,
> s_off - t_off - t_sz);
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index beb96866f34d..83d71d6912f5 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
> #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> #include <linux/bpf_lsm.h>
> #include <linux/poll.h>
> +#include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <linux/bpf-netns.h>
> #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
> #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
> @@ -230,6 +231,60 @@ static int bpf_map_update_value(struct bpf_map *map, struct fd f, void *key,
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int copy_map_value_cmp(const void *_a, const void *_b)
> +{
> + const u32 a = *(const u32 *)_a;
> + const u32 b = *(const u32 *)_b;
> +
> + /* We only need to sort based on offset */
> + if (a < b)
> + return -1;
> + else if (a > b)
> + return 1;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +void copy_map_value_slow(struct bpf_map *map, void *dst, void *src, u32 s_off,
> + u32 s_sz, u32 t_off, u32 t_sz)
> +{
> + struct bpf_map_value_off *tab = map->ptr_off_tab; /* already set to non-NULL */
> + /* 3 = 2 for bpf_timer, bpf_spin_lock, 1 for map->value_size sentinel */
> + struct {
> + u32 off;
> + u32 sz;
> + } off_arr[BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_MAX + 3];
> + int i, cnt = 0;
> +
> + /* Reconsider stack usage when bumping BPF_MAP_VALUE_OFF_MAX */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(off_arr) != 88);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < tab->nr_off; i++) {
> + off_arr[cnt].off = tab->off[i].offset;
> + off_arr[cnt++].sz = sizeof(u64);
> + }
> + if (s_sz) {
> + off_arr[cnt].off = s_off;
> + off_arr[cnt++].sz = s_sz;
> + }
> + if (t_sz) {
> + off_arr[cnt].off = t_off;
> + off_arr[cnt++].sz = t_sz;
> + }
> + off_arr[cnt].off = map->value_size;
> +
> + sort(off_arr, cnt, sizeof(off_arr[0]), copy_map_value_cmp, NULL);
Ouch. sort every time we need to copy map value?
sort it once please. 88 bytes in a map are worth it.
Especially since "slow" version will trigger with just 2 kptrs.
(if I understand this correctly).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists