[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220223075517.468dec75@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 07:55:17 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
<toke@...e.dk>,
Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
<toke@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: Correct wrong BH disable in
hard-interrupt.
On Wed, 23 Feb 2022 09:05:43 +0100 Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-02-16 18:50:46 [+0100], Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > I missed the obvious case where netif_ix() is invoked from hard-IRQ
> > context.
> >
> > Disabling bottom halves is only needed in process context. This ensures
> > that the code remains on the current CPU and that the soft-interrupts
> > are processed at local_bh_enable() time.
> > In hard- and soft-interrupt context this is already the case and the
> > soft-interrupts will be processed once the context is left (at irq-exit
> > time).
> >
> > Disable bottom halves if neither hard-interrupts nor soft-interrupts are
> > disabled. Update the kernel-doc, mention that interrupts must be enabled
> > if invoked from process context.
> >
> > Fixes: baebdf48c3600 ("net: dev: Makes sure netif_rx() can be invoked in any context.")
> > Reported-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
>
> This patch is marked as "Changes Requested" in patchwork. Could someone
> please explain?
> The USB/dwc3 fallout reported by Marek was addressed in
> usb: dwc3: gadget: Let the interrupt handler disable bottom halves.
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/Yg/YPejVQH3KkRVd@linutronix.de
>
> and is not a shortcoming in this patch but a problem in dwc3 that was
> just noticed.
Unclear, let me apply it now.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists