[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21c87173-667f-55c1-2eab-a1f684c75352@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 17:05:51 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@...hat.com>
To: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org, ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net,
hawk@...nel.org, saeed@...nel.org, ttoukan.linux@...il.com
Cc: brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next v6 1/2] page_pool: Add page_pool stats
On 23/02/2022 01.00, Joe Damato wrote:
> Add per-cpu per-pool statistics counters for the allocation path of a page
> pool.
>
> This code is disabled by default and a kernel config option is provided for
> users who wish to enable them.
>
> The statistics added are:
> - fast: successful fast path allocations
> - slow: slow path order-0 allocations
> - slow_high_order: slow path high order allocations
> - empty: ptr ring is empty, so a slow path allocation was forced.
> - refill: an allocation which triggered a refill of the cache
> - waive: pages obtained from the ptr ring that cannot be added to
> the cache due to a NUMA mismatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> ---
> include/net/page_pool.h | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
> net/Kconfig | 13 +++++++++++++
> net/core/page_pool.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool.h b/include/net/page_pool.h
> index 97c3c19..bedc82f 100644
> --- a/include/net/page_pool.h
> +++ b/include/net/page_pool.h
> @@ -135,7 +135,25 @@ struct page_pool {
> refcount_t user_cnt;
>
> u64 destroy_cnt;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL_STATS
> + struct page_pool_stats __percpu *stats ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> +#endif
> +};
Adding this to the end of the struct and using attribute
____cacheline_aligned_in_smp cause the structure have a lot of wasted
padding in the end.
I recommend using the tool pahole to see the struct layout.
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PAGE_POOL_STATS
> +struct page_pool_stats {
> + struct {
> + u64 fast; /* fast path allocations */
> + u64 slow; /* slow-path order 0 allocations */
> + u64 slow_high_order; /* slow-path high order allocations */
> + u64 empty; /* failed refills due to empty ptr ring, forcing
> + * slow path allocation
> + */
> + u64 refill; /* allocations via successful refill */
> + u64 waive; /* failed refills due to numa zone mismatch */
> + } alloc;
> };
> +#endif
All of these stats are for page_pool allocation "RX" side, which is
protected by softirq/NAPI.
Thus, I find it unnecessary to do __percpu stats.
As Ilias have pointed out-before, the __percpu stats (first) becomes
relevant once we want stats for the free/"return" path ... which is not
part of this patchset.
--Jesper
Powered by blists - more mailing lists