[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220223082255.13136ade@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 08:22:55 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
<idosch@...dia.com>, <dsahern@...il.com>, <bpoirier@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 07/12] rtnetlink: add new rtm tunnel api for
tunnel id filtering
On Tue, 22 Feb 2022 22:31:18 -0800 Roopa Prabhu wrote:
> > Makes sense. I wasn't quite sure if this isn't over-engineering
> > - do deployments really use VxLAN devs with many VNIs?
>
> yes, vnis are unfortunately used to stretch layer 2 domains exceeding
> the 4k vlan limit
>
> In the example provided in this series, vnis can be deployed in the
> ranges of more than 15k if each customer is allocated a 4k vlan range
> (bridge domain),
>
> and a single switch can host 3-4 customers.
>
> the scale is also the reason to switch to dst metadata devices when
> deployed vni numbers get large. The traditional vxlan netdev per vni
> does not work well at this scale.
Ah, now it all clicked together, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists