lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220223224332.2965690-31-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Wed, 23 Feb 2022 23:43:26 +0100
From:   Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 30/36] can: mcp251xfd: mcp251xfd_ring_init(): split ring_init into separate functions

This patch splits the initialization of the TEF, TX and RX FIFO in the
mcp251xfd_ring_init() function into separate functions. This is a
preparation patch to move the RX FIFO in front of the TX FIFO.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220217103826.2299157-3-mkl@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
---
 .../net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c    | 100 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
index 6e394ac0bc5e..b9300554543e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/spi/mcp251xfd/mcp251xfd-ring.c
@@ -52,6 +52,45 @@ mcp251xfd_cmd_prepare_write_reg(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
 	return len;
 }
 
+static void mcp251xfd_ring_init_tef(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct mcp251xfd_tef_ring *tef_ring;
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer;
+	u32 val;
+	u16 addr;
+	u8 len;
+	int i;
+
+	/* TEF */
+	tef_ring = priv->tef;
+	tef_ring->head = 0;
+	tef_ring->tail = 0;
+
+	/* FIFO increment TEF tail pointer */
+	addr = MCP251XFD_REG_TEFCON;
+	val = MCP251XFD_REG_TEFCON_UINC;
+	len = mcp251xfd_cmd_prepare_write_reg(priv, &tef_ring->uinc_buf,
+					      addr, val, val);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tef_ring->uinc_xfer); i++) {
+		xfer = &tef_ring->uinc_xfer[i];
+		xfer->tx_buf = &tef_ring->uinc_buf;
+		xfer->len = len;
+		xfer->cs_change = 1;
+		xfer->cs_change_delay.value = 0;
+		xfer->cs_change_delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_NSECS;
+	}
+
+	/* "cs_change == 1" on the last transfer results in an active
+	 * chip select after the complete SPI message. This causes the
+	 * controller to interpret the next register access as
+	 * data. Set "cs_change" of the last transfer to "0" to
+	 * properly deactivate the chip select at the end of the
+	 * message.
+	 */
+	xfer->cs_change = 0;
+}
+
 static void
 mcp251xfd_tx_ring_init_tx_obj(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
 			      const struct mcp251xfd_tx_ring *ring,
@@ -88,50 +127,15 @@ mcp251xfd_tx_ring_init_tx_obj(const struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv,
 					ARRAY_SIZE(tx_obj->xfer));
 }
 
-void mcp251xfd_ring_init(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
+static void mcp251xfd_ring_init_tx(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
 {
-	struct mcp251xfd_tef_ring *tef_ring;
 	struct mcp251xfd_tx_ring *tx_ring;
-	struct mcp251xfd_rx_ring *rx_ring, *prev_rx_ring = NULL;
 	struct mcp251xfd_tx_obj *tx_obj;
-	struct spi_transfer *xfer;
 	u32 val;
 	u16 addr;
 	u8 len;
-	int i, j;
-
-	netdev_reset_queue(priv->ndev);
-
-	/* TEF */
-	tef_ring = priv->tef;
-	tef_ring->head = 0;
-	tef_ring->tail = 0;
-
-	/* FIFO increment TEF tail pointer */
-	addr = MCP251XFD_REG_TEFCON;
-	val = MCP251XFD_REG_TEFCON_UINC;
-	len = mcp251xfd_cmd_prepare_write_reg(priv, &tef_ring->uinc_buf,
-					      addr, val, val);
-
-	for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(tef_ring->uinc_xfer); j++) {
-		xfer = &tef_ring->uinc_xfer[j];
-		xfer->tx_buf = &tef_ring->uinc_buf;
-		xfer->len = len;
-		xfer->cs_change = 1;
-		xfer->cs_change_delay.value = 0;
-		xfer->cs_change_delay.unit = SPI_DELAY_UNIT_NSECS;
-	}
-
-	/* "cs_change == 1" on the last transfer results in an active
-	 * chip select after the complete SPI message. This causes the
-	 * controller to interpret the next register access as
-	 * data. Set "cs_change" of the last transfer to "0" to
-	 * properly deactivate the chip select at the end of the
-	 * message.
-	 */
-	xfer->cs_change = 0;
+	int i;
 
-	/* TX */
 	tx_ring = priv->tx;
 	tx_ring->head = 0;
 	tx_ring->tail = 0;
@@ -147,8 +151,19 @@ void mcp251xfd_ring_init(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
 
 	mcp251xfd_for_each_tx_obj(tx_ring, tx_obj, i)
 		mcp251xfd_tx_ring_init_tx_obj(priv, tx_ring, tx_obj, len, i);
+}
+
+static void mcp251xfd_ring_init_rx(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
+{
+	struct mcp251xfd_rx_ring *rx_ring, *prev_rx_ring = NULL;
+	struct mcp251xfd_tx_ring *tx_ring;
+	struct spi_transfer *xfer;
+	u32 val;
+	u16 addr;
+	u8 len;
+	int i, j;
 
-	/* RX */
+	tx_ring = priv->tx;
 	mcp251xfd_for_each_rx_ring(priv, rx_ring, i) {
 		rx_ring->head = 0;
 		rx_ring->tail = 0;
@@ -192,6 +207,15 @@ void mcp251xfd_ring_init(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
 	}
 }
 
+void mcp251xfd_ring_init(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
+{
+	netdev_reset_queue(priv->ndev);
+
+	mcp251xfd_ring_init_tef(priv);
+	mcp251xfd_ring_init_tx(priv);
+	mcp251xfd_ring_init_rx(priv);
+}
+
 void mcp251xfd_ring_free(struct mcp251xfd_priv *priv)
 {
 	int i;
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ