[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220224001123.365265-10-saeed@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:11:13 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeed@...nel.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>,
Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: [v2 net 09/19] net/mlx5: Fix possible deadlock on rule deletion
From: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>
Add missing call to up_write_ref_node() which releases the semaphore
in case the FTE doesn't have destinations, such in drop rule case.
Fixes: 465e7baab6d9 ("net/mlx5: Fix deletion of duplicate rules")
Signed-off-by: Maor Gottlieb <maorg@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
index b628917e38e4..537c82b9aa53 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/fs_core.c
@@ -2074,6 +2074,8 @@ void mlx5_del_flow_rules(struct mlx5_flow_handle *handle)
fte->node.del_hw_func = NULL;
up_write_ref_node(&fte->node, false);
tree_put_node(&fte->node, false);
+ } else {
+ up_write_ref_node(&fte->node, false);
}
kfree(handle);
}
--
2.35.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists