[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220225112405.355599-9-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 12:24:03 +0100
From: Jerome Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jérôme Pouiller
<jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 08/10] staging: wfx: prefer to wait for an event instead to sleep
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
When possible it is better to wait for an explicit event instead of wait
an arbitrary amount of time.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
index 0b1ed12c0e83..ae3cc5919dcd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx.c
@@ -72,8 +72,8 @@ int wfx_cmd_send(struct wfx_dev *wdev, struct wfx_hif_msg *request,
wfx_bh_request_tx(wdev);
if (no_reply) {
- /* Chip won't reply. Give enough time to the wq to send the buffer. */
- msleep(100);
+ /* Chip won't reply. Ensure the wq has send the buffer before to continue. */
+ flush_workqueue(system_highpri_wq);
ret = 0;
goto end;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists