[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220225074733.118664-7-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:47:33 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 6/6] xfrm: enforce validity of offload input flags
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
struct xfrm_user_offload has flags variable that received user input,
but kernel didn't check if valid bits were provided. It caused a situation
where not sanitized input was forwarded directly to the drivers.
For example, XFRM_OFFLOAD_IPV6 define that was exposed, was used by
strongswan, but not implemented in the kernel at all.
As a solution, check and sanitize input flags to forward
XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND to the drivers.
Fixes: d77e38e612a0 ("xfrm: Add an IPsec hardware offloading API")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 6 ++++++
net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 6 +++++-
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
index 4e29d7851890..65e13a099b1a 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h
@@ -511,6 +511,12 @@ struct xfrm_user_offload {
int ifindex;
__u8 flags;
};
+/* This flag was exposed without any kernel code that supporting it.
+ * Unfortunately, strongswan has the code that uses sets this flag,
+ * which makes impossible to reuse this bit.
+ *
+ * So leave it here to make sure that it won't be reused by mistake.
+ */
#define XFRM_OFFLOAD_IPV6 1
#define XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND 2
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
index 3fa066419d37..39bce5d764de 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
@@ -223,6 +223,9 @@ int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x,
if (x->encap || x->tfcpad)
return -EINVAL;
+ if (xuo->flags & ~(XFRM_OFFLOAD_IPV6 | XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
dev = dev_get_by_index(net, xuo->ifindex);
if (!dev) {
if (!(xuo->flags & XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND)) {
@@ -262,7 +265,8 @@ int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x,
netdev_tracker_alloc(dev, &xso->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
xso->real_dev = dev;
xso->num_exthdrs = 1;
- xso->flags = xuo->flags;
+ /* Don't forward bit that is not implemented */
+ xso->flags = xuo->flags & ~XFRM_OFFLOAD_IPV6;
err = dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(x);
if (err) {
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists