[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1458f39-a2fe-36bf-af8d-ef2162f7c514@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:07:20 +0100
From: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH REBASED 2/2] dt-bindings: nvmem: cells: add MAC address
cell
On 1.02.2022 18:01, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-02-01 16:55, schrieb Rob Herring:
>> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 08:07:45AM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>>
>>> This adds support for describing details of NVMEM cell containing MAC
>>> address. Those are often device specific and could be nicely stored in
>>> DT.
>>>
>>> Initial documentation includes support for describing:
>>> 1. Cell data format (e.g. Broadcom's NVRAM uses ASCII to store MAC)
>>> 2. Reversed bytes flash (required for i.MX6/i.MX7 OCOTP support)
>>> 3. Source for multiple addresses (very common in home routers)
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/nvmem/cells/mac-address.yaml | 94 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/cells/mac-address.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/cells/mac-address.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/cells/mac-address.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..f8d19e87cdf0
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/nvmem/cells/mac-address.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/nvmem/cells/mac-address.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: NVMEM cell containing a MAC address
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Rafał Miłecki <rafal@...ecki.pl>
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + const: mac-address
>>> +
>>> + format:
>>> + description: |
>>> + Some NVMEM cells contain MAC in a non-binary format.
>>> +
>>> + ASCII should be specified if MAC is string formatted like:
>>> + - "01:23:45:67:89:AB" (30 31 3a 32 33 3a 34 35 3a 36 37 3a 38 39 3a 41 42)
>>> + - "01-23-45-67-89-AB"
>>> + - "0123456789AB"
>>> + enum:
>>> + - ascii
>>> +
>>> + reversed-bytes:
>>> + type: boolean
>>> + description: |
>>> + MAC is stored in reversed bytes order. Example:
>>> + Stored value: AB 89 67 45 23 01
>>> + Actual MAC: 01 23 45 67 89 AB
>>> +
>>> + base-address:
>>> + type: boolean
>>> + description: |
>>> + Marks NVMEM cell as provider of multiple addresses that are relative to
>>> + the one actually stored physically. Respective addresses can be requested
>>> + by specifying cell index of NVMEM cell.
>>
>> While a base address is common, aren't there different ways the base is
>> modified.
>>
>> The problem with these properties is every new variation results in a
>> new property and the end result is something not well designed. A unique
>> compatible string, "#nvmem-cell-cells" and code to interpret the data is
>> more flexible.
>
> I actually like having a unique compatible for anything but the basic
> operations. For example, the sl28 vpd area also has a checksum, which
> could be handled if there is an own compatible. I don't think this is
> possible with this proposal. Also there is a version field, what if
> we change the layout of that thing? Am I supposed to change the
> device tree? The more I think about Rob's proposal to have a compatible
> the more I like it.
Having more detailed binding for cells doesn't stop you from using NVMEM
device specific binding.
You could have e.g.
partition@...000 {
compatible = "foo,foo-cells", "nvmem-cells";
(...)
mac@100 {
compatible = "mac-address";
reg = <0x100 0x6>;
};
OR
mac@100 {
compatible = "mac-address";
reg = <0x100 0x11>;
format = "ascii";
};
};
Then you can have "foo,foo-cells" driver handling checksum.
I'm not saying we have to use this solution, just saying it's possible.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists