[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220228131844.GD2812@kadam>
Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2022 16:18:44 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arnd Bergman <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Brian Johannesmeyer <bjohannesmeyer@...il.com>,
Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@...nl>,
"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@...nl>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] drivers: usb: remove usage of list iterator past the
loop body
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 01:03:36PM +0100, Jakob Koschel wrote:
> >> @@ -954,7 +957,6 @@ net2272_dequeue(struct usb_ep *_ep, struct usb_request *_req)
> >> dev_dbg(ep->dev->dev, "unlink (%s) pio\n", _ep->name);
> >> net2272_done(ep, req, -ECONNRESET);
> >> }
> >> - req = NULL;
> >
> > Another unrelated change. These are all good changes but send them as
> > separate patches.
>
> You are referring to the req = NULL, right?
Yes.
>
> I've changed the use of 'req' in the same function and assumed that I can
> just remove the unnecessary statement. But if it's better to do separately
> I'll do that.
>
These are all changes which made me pause during my review to figure out
why they were necessary. The line between what is a related part of a
patch is a bit vague and some maintainers will ask you to add or subtract
from a patch depending on their individual tastes. I don't really have
an exact answer, but I felt like this patch needs to be subtracted from.
Especially if there is a whole chunk of the patch which can be removed,
then to me, that obviously should be in a different patch.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists