[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh4VHFviMI/LbjVe@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 12:44:12 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, tiwai@...e.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
kafai@...com, songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, f.suligoi@...m.it,
kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsi: Add check for clk_enable
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 03:39:49PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> As the potential failure of the clk_enable(),
> it should be better to check it and return error
> if fails.
> - clk_enable(clock->xck);
> - clk_enable(clock->ick);
> - clk_enable(clock->div);
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->xck);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->ick);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> + ret = clk_enable(clock->div);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
>
> clock->count++;
> }
>
> return ret;
> +
> +err:
> + clk_disable(clock->xck);
> + clk_disable(clock->ick);
> + clk_disable(clock->div);
You need separate labels for each enable so that we don't end up
disabling clocks we didn't enable, that would also be a bug.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists