[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yh4855Np63fEUl4G@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2022 09:33:59 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>,
linux-can@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>,
Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: can: renesas,rcar-canfd: Document
RZ/V2L SoC
On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 09:32:50PM +0000, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> Document RZ/V2L CANFD bindings. RZ/V2L CANFD is identical to one found on
> the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic compatible
> string "renesas,rzg2l-canfd" will be used as a fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> ---
> DTSI changes [0] have been posted as part of separate series.
>
> [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/patch/
> 20220227203744.18355-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com/
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/renesas,rcar-canfd.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
The patch wouldn't apply, but I don't see the problem other than the
sha hashes are not from a known base. Please send patches against a
known rcX (rc1 is preferred) unless you have some other dependency. And
document that dependency.
Anyways, it is applied manually now.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists