netdev - Re: [PATCH 1/6] Kbuild: compile kernel with gnu11 std

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0QAECV=_Bu5xnBxjxUHLcaGjBgJEjfMaeKT7StR=acyQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 1 Mar 2022 21:54:30 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Xiaomeng Tong <xiam0nd.tong@...il.com>,
        kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Kbuild: compile kernel with gnu11 std

On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 9:16 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 10:00 AM kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> >
> > >> cc1: warning: result of '-117440512 << 16' requires 44 bits to represent, but 'int' only has 32 bits [-Wshift-overflow=]
>
> So that's potentially an interesting warning, but this email doesn't
> actually tell *where* that warning happens.
>
> I'm not entirely sure why this warning is new to this '-std=gnu11'
> change, but it's intriguing.
...
>
> Is there some place to actually see the full log (or some way to get a
> better pointer to just the new warning) to see that actual shift
> overflow thing?

gcc-11 only shows the one line warning here. The source is

/* PCI CFG04 status fields */
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_BIT      16
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT          0xffff0000
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_66_MHZ   (1 << 21)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_FBB      (1 << 23)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_MDPE     (1 << 24)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_DST      (1 << 25)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_STA      (1 << 27)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_RTA      (1 << 28)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_RMA      (1 << 29)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_SSE      (1 << 30)
#define PCI_CFG04_STAT_PE       (1 << 31)
#define KORINA_STAT             (PCI_CFG04_STAT_MDPE | \
                                 PCI_CFG04_STAT_STA | \
                                 PCI_CFG04_STAT_RTA | \
                                 PCI_CFG04_STAT_RMA | \
                                 PCI_CFG04_STAT_SSE | \
                                 PCI_CFG04_STAT_PE)
#define KORINA_CNFG1            ((KORINA_STAT<<16)|KORINA_CMD)

unsigned int korina_cnfg_regs[25] = {
        KORINA_CNFG1, /* ... */
};

This looks like an actual bug to me, the bits are shifted 16 bits twice
by accident, and it's been like this since rb532 was introduced in
2008.

         Arnd