netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: tun: track dropped skb via kfree_skb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 2 Mar 2022 11:22:55 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc:     Dongli Zhang <dongli.zhang@...cle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        davem@...emloft.net, rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com,
        ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
        imagedong@...cent.com, joao.m.martins@...cle.com,
        joe.jin@...cle.com, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 4/4] net: tun: track dropped skb via
 kfree_skb_reason()

On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 20:29:37 -0700 David Ahern wrote:
> On 3/1/22 7:50 PM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Sat, 26 Feb 2022 00:49:29 -0800 Dongli Zhang wrote:  
> >> +	SKB_DROP_REASON_SKB_PULL,	/* failed to pull sk_buff data */
> >> +	SKB_DROP_REASON_SKB_TRIM,	/* failed to trim sk_buff data */  
> > 
> > IDK if these are not too low level and therefore lacking meaning.
> > 
> > What are your thoughts David?  
> 
> I agree. Not every kfree_skb is worthy of a reason. "Internal
> housekeeping" errors are random and nothing a user / admin can do about
> drops.
> 
> IMHO, the value of the reason code is when it aligns with SNMP counters
> (original motivation for this direction) and relevant details like TCP
> or UDP checksum mismatch, packets for a socket that is not open, socket
> is full, ring buffer is full, packets for "other host", etc.

Agreed :(